Biomedical engineer turned live-performance sensation Girl Talk, has received immense commercial and critical success for his mind-blowing sample-based music.
Point 2 is invalid, since not everyone is a Levi-straussian bricoleur.
There's a difference between innovate and invent. Inventions are not innovations! Actually, that kind of discourse is based on capitalist ideology, to combine existing things into new things means more things to sell...
Then based on that concept, Warhol and most of the pop art movement were *not* artists, because they were taking artwork of others and re-imagining it. Is music not allowed to be re-imagined by someone who's leaving some of the original artistic intention intact, or are we only going to limit that ability to cover bands who don't even make the track something new and different from the original?
Should artists be able to explore and expand existing ideas? Of course they should. They can and they do all the time.
Should lazy people be allowed to take the actual work of others, repackage, distribute and broadcast it in order to line their pockets? of course not.
Girl Talk is actually a broadcaster and record label. His LapTop is actually only an audio file playback device.
I still don't get your point. I am not lacking in my understanding of the word 'cacophony'. I just don't know what you are trying to say in relation to this clip?
"Stealing: a thieves manifesto" would be more apt. Girl Talk is a talentless piece of shit,
Bud1UK 3 days ago
Music is NOT public domain,and Girl Talk bitch Id like to mash your face
independentjames1 8 months ago
Point 2 is invalid, since not everyone is a Levi-straussian bricoleur.
There's a difference between innovate and invent. Inventions are not innovations! Actually, that kind of discourse is based on capitalist ideology, to combine existing things into new things means more things to sell...
yidaki53 1 year ago
one of the most important documentaries of our generation
realeyes1ness 1 year ago
Then based on that concept, Warhol and most of the pop art movement were *not* artists, because they were taking artwork of others and re-imagining it. Is music not allowed to be re-imagined by someone who's leaving some of the original artistic intention intact, or are we only going to limit that ability to cover bands who don't even make the track something new and different from the original?
evilrob 1 year ago
Should artists be able to explore and expand existing ideas? Of course they should. They can and they do all the time.
Should lazy people be allowed to take the actual work of others, repackage, distribute and broadcast it in order to line their pockets? of course not.
Girl Talk is actually a broadcaster and record label. His LapTop is actually only an audio file playback device.
Sorry but the term 'artist' just doesn't fit.
Hufflewaffle 2 years ago
I still don't get your point. I am not lacking in my understanding of the word 'cacophony'. I just don't know what you are trying to say in relation to this clip?
cinemabest 2 years ago
check your dictionary - it's a word I learned in high school, when people got a great education there - long ago.
3martijns 2 years ago
what do you mean
cinemabest 2 years ago
cacophony
3martijns 2 years ago