God knows men need His help understanding His Word. That is His position, as He is the best Teacher, not man. If you can understand your "Bible' fresh out of the gate, then it must not be His Bible. If you ask God for help with the whole heart then you may obtain a sure foundation to build upon.
"Apply thine heart unto instruction, and thine ears to the words of knowledge." Proverbs 23:12
We have to shew an earnest desire before God to learn His Word. And sinning against Him gets us nowhere.
The KJV is the main attraction in English after true repentance for sure. Until then your only kidding yourself anyhow. BTW, the King James is based upon the Majority Text for the New Testament portion of the Scriptures. Just don't neglect the other 3/4 of the Holy Bible. Proverbs chapter 1 is a great place to begin a very profitable investigation. Yet, that's only after repentance from sin too. There are always tons of commentaries available to sift through, if you enjoy the company of mockers.
The reason certain verses were removed is because they were added in later manuscripts, but are entirely missing in older, more reliable (and complete) manuscripts that predate those in the "Textus Receptus." It is these later manuscripts that "add to" the Word of God, and it is these newer, added-to, adulterated manuscripts that comprise the KJV. That said, the KJV is still my personal favorite and the bedrock standard. I just wanted to share some facts that many are ignorant of.
@DinoDude65 I suppose everyone who's edited, added, and deleted content would say that it wasn't perfectly written in the first place.
It appears that the maker of this video thinks King James must have been more important than Jesus himself to have edited this supposed 'God's word' into a work of perfection. Too bad it's still full of fallacies, circular logic, and logical dead ends. But to a good Christian, that makes for a good book.
Some gospel accounts were written by uninspired people. They were most likely Gnostics or pagans. What is in my Bible is what God intended to be kept throughout the ages. The Gospel of Thomas, for example, is Gnostic material. They don't believe that Jesus is the Christ. The same kind of people wrote the Sinaiticus, and it's now an extremely popular manuscript among the new Bible versions.
The KJV is the result of plenty of edits and deletions. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were lucky to make it into the Bible. Guess how many gospels were voted - yes voted - out. At least 16. How many authors did the Bible have? About 40. Are any of them verified in any other works outside of the Bible? Few. David perhaps.
If the Bible is a democratic work that was assembled in such a way by committees of men, how can it possibly be the word of God?
God knows men need His help understanding His Word. That is His position, as He is the best Teacher, not man. If you can understand your "Bible' fresh out of the gate, then it must not be His Bible. If you ask God for help with the whole heart then you may obtain a sure foundation to build upon.
"Apply thine heart unto instruction, and thine ears to the words of knowledge." Proverbs 23:12
We have to shew an earnest desire before God to learn His Word. And sinning against Him gets us nowhere.
Tsijon 1 month ago
The KJV is the main attraction in English after true repentance for sure. Until then your only kidding yourself anyhow. BTW, the King James is based upon the Majority Text for the New Testament portion of the Scriptures. Just don't neglect the other 3/4 of the Holy Bible. Proverbs chapter 1 is a great place to begin a very profitable investigation. Yet, that's only after repentance from sin too. There are always tons of commentaries available to sift through, if you enjoy the company of mockers.
Paucus1 1 month ago
The reason certain verses were removed is because they were added in later manuscripts, but are entirely missing in older, more reliable (and complete) manuscripts that predate those in the "Textus Receptus." It is these later manuscripts that "add to" the Word of God, and it is these newer, added-to, adulterated manuscripts that comprise the KJV. That said, the KJV is still my personal favorite and the bedrock standard. I just wanted to share some facts that many are ignorant of.
TheHorta 1 month ago
what bible did they use before the KJV?
schpoogie 1 month ago
Does anyone know why KJV believers do not follow the majority text?
preachinshawn 1 month ago
@DinoDude65 I suppose everyone who's edited, added, and deleted content would say that it wasn't perfectly written in the first place.
It appears that the maker of this video thinks King James must have been more important than Jesus himself to have edited this supposed 'God's word' into a work of perfection. Too bad it's still full of fallacies, circular logic, and logical dead ends. But to a good Christian, that makes for a good book.
ChipArgyle 2 months ago
@ChipArgyle
What says that it wasn't?
DinoDude65 2 months ago
@DinoDude65 If it was truly a divine text, it would have been perfectly written in the first place.
ChipArgyle 2 months ago
@ChipArgyle
Some gospel accounts were written by uninspired people. They were most likely Gnostics or pagans. What is in my Bible is what God intended to be kept throughout the ages. The Gospel of Thomas, for example, is Gnostic material. They don't believe that Jesus is the Christ. The same kind of people wrote the Sinaiticus, and it's now an extremely popular manuscript among the new Bible versions.
DinoDude65 2 months ago
The KJV is the result of plenty of edits and deletions. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were lucky to make it into the Bible. Guess how many gospels were voted - yes voted - out. At least 16. How many authors did the Bible have? About 40. Are any of them verified in any other works outside of the Bible? Few. David perhaps.
If the Bible is a democratic work that was assembled in such a way by committees of men, how can it possibly be the word of God?
ChipArgyle 2 months ago