Empirical Evidence U.S. Armed Saddam - Part 1

Here is empirical evidence that the U.S. armed saddam with chemical and biological MUNITIONS - not just dual-use items or raw materials. Why did the government deny possible troop exposures to chemicals and biologicals, but then said they knew about it along and just got the names of bunkers mixed up?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• us
• armed
• saddam
• hussein
• chemical
• biological
• weapons
• international
• law
• violation
• geneva
• war
• criminals
• iraq

[cyberpsygen7]

no, its not shit. its total truth and even you yourself have had to concede that its common knowledge we armed iraq. this is a common tactic, let the first hand witnesses die off so we can turn around and deny the whole thing asap. why do you think they declared the air in new york safe to breathe so soon after that enormous cloud of pulverized concrete and asbestos came from the controlled demolition of the 3 wtc buildings.

[Koenig1980]

Wow. This is really quite shit isn't it? Nice use of selective editing and directive naration. Its common knowledge that the Iraqi's were "armed" by the US back in the 70's, if they weren't, the middle east would belong to Iran now. This "story" can be traced back to Special operations Unit 731 in Japan WW2. Instead of believing this shit, learn a bit about history. Don't forget to use your brain if you are able.