Prophecy predicts Benedict to change name
Uploader Comments (ronjohnston7)
All Comments (133)
-
FOR THE REAL MEANING OF 666 SEE - RemnantofGodDOTorg/666.htm (replace the DOT with a period)
-
@roadrunnervideo1 William Miller's prediction was prophesied to occur in Revelation 10:9. Yours was not. Comparing yourself to Miller also speaks volumes to what you're doing. Did Miller ever erase all his works and hide them after they failed, to try and save face? No, but you did. Truth is, the fact he failed proved he was still in God's will. Rev 10:9 proved that. You also twist the meaning of the 666 to generate confusion. You sir, are a false prophet.
-
@NicholasPOGM Was William Miller correct in predicting 1843 Jesus return? You would have been scoffing at William Miller if you would have lived in his time. Like others you do not search the scriptures for understanding but instead scoff. You need to examine your relationship with Jesus. You need to study closely the events of Revelation 17. You are on shaky ground. Be careful what you say before making accusations you just may find yourself in an odd position.
-
Ron Johnston predicted the next Pope after John Paul II died would have an original name wherein a number ONE would be in his title. He was told by myself and other students of prophecy he was wrong. He persisted. Then JP2 died, and Benedict 16 was elected. ROn then immediately removed his false prophecy. But not before I posted it online for all to see. He is a proven false prophet. See this... remnantofgodDOTorg/666man.htm
-
@ronjohnston7 Amen brother! Thanks for the insightful studies. Love the advancing light! Let's remain hid with Christ in God with our garments washed in the blood of the Lamb for the time is at hand. we're going home soon! Praise God! Did you see my other comment about Lucifer's personation of Christ?
-
@NRMinternational One thing for sure it will be the 8th papal name since 1798. Lets watch the unrolling of the scroll. Many think when Christ said he came in his fathers name and another will come in his own name. Many think he will use his own name. I only know that when we have the 8th Papal name since 1798 we are there.
-
@ronjohnston7 Here's a possible scenario. There was a disciple who had a name change. Simon Barjona or Simon son of Jonah. Christ gave him the name Peter. If Lucifer who is the coming antichrist will personate Christ's coming to earth again, might Lucifer, in imitation of Christ, honor Benedict as his vicar by changing his name to Peter the Roman as Christ changed Simon's name to Peter, signaling that he has built his church on the pope and all the world must bow before Antichrist and his vicar?
-
Come to think of it, not sure bout Benedict as you say, Rev 17:10 indicates to me at the time of the vision John was seeing the 6th Pope king who would be JP2.
The 7th lasts a short space of time, that's Benedict.
Verse 11 of chpt 17 seems to indicate a copy of the sixth that once was, meaning JP2 clone.
Going back to Rev 17:8 also indicates he'll be a demon mascurading as a human Pope very much like JP2, if not claiming to be him.
Just a few thoughts.
-
Sounds 'ok' to me, yeah, him and Sarkozy, a cozy duo!
-
@MrCraigfarrow That would be βενεδικτος. I tried it and... you're right! It totals 666. A multitude of witnesses.
I would have to say for sure that this pope is the beast of revelation.
his actions reflect that.
Where is the best place to hide than right in our faces.
This pope is the last pope.
Our days on earth are short,what can we do to stop him?
EagleTalon1970 2 months ago
@EagleTalon1970 Thanks for your comment. It has been an honor to present these materials since 1999. Their is a huge story behind all this. I will assure you supernatural powers have been involved. I await the day for Benedict to change his name, then the midnight cry begins spoken of in scripture. The cry will go out behold the bride groom comes. This is the message of the 4th angel spoken of in Revelation 18 uniting with the 3rd angel in Revelation 14. The world is to be astonished!
ronjohnston7 2 months ago
Someone can't add (we now have Benedict the 16th, where is Benedict the 15th in your list and besides we have had 23 pope John's not 21 as in your list) or is some new math we don't know about, so you can have the number that suits your false premise. You people are constantly misinterpreting the Bible.
bpijne 4 months ago
@bpijne You think we can not add, you need to count the popes literally off the official list. I made the same mistake 10 years ago, go to the official Vatican list and literally count the John's then literally count the Benedicts. It is true that Benedicts count goes over 666, But The great thing about all this is that Benedict changes his name to a new Papal name making a count of 1, Watch as the scroll unrolls. In Ancient Babylon they counted each one.
ronjohnston7 4 months ago