Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Proof God is Real by VenomFungX

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,584
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 18, 2008

http://freehovind.com/watch-430823506...

God is eternal and not created. Firstly, you have 2 choices; either everything came from nothing (which is impossible), or something always existed and created us. You have no other choice.

This thing that always existed would be considered Eternal, having transcended time, space, and matter, being everlasting, having always existed. If you argue this is impossible, I would argue the contrary; it is impossible for this Eternal 'thing' to not exist, because the alternative is that nothing existed, which could only produce nothing. So, something always existed, and is therefor Eternal.

Now, for something to be Eternal, it can not consist of time, because time must have had a beginning. We exist in a universe of causality, so an infinite regress is impossible; there could not have been an infinite amount of time before right now, because we never would have reached this moment in time. That means time had a beginning, and whatever created time exists without time, beyond time, in timelessness; Eternity.

So, this Eternal Creator, created time, and the universe. This Eternal Creator cleary is extremely powerful, because the energy of the trillions of stars in the known universe were created by this Creator. And obviously, the Creator is extremely intelligent, having created an intelligent being such as mankind and a world in which to populate with it.

Or;


Time is the measure of the changes in matter. If matter ceases from changing, time ceases to exist. Likewise, space is the measure of the distance between two pieces of matter, and if matter ceased from being, so would space.

The question is; could there be an infinite sequence of changes between two events? If not, there could not be an infinite sequence of changes before right now. The obvious answer is no, there could not be an infinite sequence of changes between two events. That means there must be a beginning of time (or the beginning of change), because there could not have been an infinite amount of time (changes) before right now. This means time came into being a certain amount of time before right now, from something that exists without time, something eternal.

If something exists without time, it necessarily exists without matter, and is therefor without space as well. Something that exists without time is Eternal, something without matter is immaterial (invisible, untouchable), and something without space is omnipresent (not bound by spacial restriction). So, an Eternal immaterial omnipresent 'something' created matter, time, and space.

I wonder what this 'something' could be?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 138 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • i guess thats what happens to religious people, they go retarted

  • i got the messagge, the absence of his proof explains the absence of what he was trying to prove which along to what he was trying to point out explains he is an idiot.

see all

All Comments (390)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why are you such fucking haters live your useless life and let people have their religions

  • @2602Jordy he is trying to show us that there is no proof.

  • @TycoonGenius So scientists make mistakes but goat herders from 2000 years ago don't? LMAO

  • Wtf?

  • @LondonIrishRover Evolution is based on empirical observations. Listen if you believe something, you are going to find things that line up with that belief. It doesn't make anything fact, it just makes someone draw a conclusion. Science can't answer the big questions of the world. Scientist make plenty of mistakes because they go in with a preset notion and let their findings follow suit. In scientific terms, we start out with a hypothesis or theory. It doesn't make our conclusions right.

  • @LondonIrishRover Homo erectus, Homo sapiens and Neanderthal coexisted

  • @TycoonGenius That is quite possible the stupidiest comment I have ever heard or read in my life. Considering I regularly have discussions with religious people, on youtube and in life, that is quite an achievement. You know, that point doesn't even need to be addressed. I'm just gonna let it be read by everyone else on this message board to show what your understanding is of evolution/biology. And now its kinda obvious that you're a troll. Well done, you had me going for a while there.

  • @LondonIrishRover Oh and humans did not evolve from primitives. Do your research. The found out that primitives lived amongst real humans.

  • @LondonIrishRover Do you really want to play the who's stupid game? Listen, let me teach you something...try observing your mind that questions GOD. Once you treat your mind as a disconnect from who you really are, let me know. Right now, you are a slave to your mind. That voice that speculates, judges, compares, complains, dislikes, criticizes etc. is useless to the real you. YOU ARE NOT YOUR MIND. Be a witness of your thoughts, watch the thinker and you will see it's not the real you.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more