The Fifth Dimension Isn't Magic

To read along with this blog go to http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2008/05/fifth-dimension-isnt-m...
Last blog we talked about the bush-like branching structure of possible "you"s that exist...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• blog
• bryanton
• dimension
• fifth
• probability
• rob
• space
• state
• tenth
• video
• magic

[itsAndrogyn]

he said: '"Time is a line and not a dimension" Ok so he changed his opinion becouse he said earyer that time is the 4rth dimension.

[10thdim]

@itsAndrogyn Like I always say, time is not a dimension, it's a direction. So when I refer to the "line of time" in this vlog I'm referring to a direction, and when you combine that with the opposite direction (anti-time) you then you do get a dimension. Likewise you could you can think about "forward" or "left", but it's forward/backward or left/right that combine to actually make a dimension. But here's the kicker: words like "forward" or "time" can be directions in any dimension.

[balzonurchin]

Rob, if you still check out these comments, then could you clarify this for me? -

If the 5th dimension includes all possibilities, then how is the 6th dimension any different than the 5th other than providing a means of jumping from one reality (or branch in the 5th dimension, if you will) to another? Why can't we consider the 5th dimension as "our universe in all possible states" like you describe the 6th to be?

[10thdim]

@balzonurchin That's a good question. Have you watched What's Around the Corner? It helps to clarify all this. watch?v=1K_MgAfeZkk

I would say thinking about the first through third dimensions is relevant. With our 3D universe, you might argue that all you need is a potentially infinite number of 2D planes to create it. Or a potentially infinite number of 1D lines could create our 3D universe as well! Same with the 4th through 6th dimensions, if you follow my line of reasoning here.

Thanks!

Rob

[CiCLimits]

you have an amazing narrator voice

[aqualobster]

@UniversalHere no offense, but your talkin out your ass. 'theory' in this context is not the same as what you think it is. All that means is there is nothing to disprove it...yet. when you work it out mathematically using laws that have already been PROVEN (not theories), the resulting evidence/calculations become quite serious.

[aqualobster]

@itsAndrogyn i swear astronomers want to punch out everyone who asks that

[Skoople88]

I really like your videos but I wish they weren't so rehearsed. Its a bit easier to follow when you speak in a conversational manner. That's just me though. I still really enjoy your vids :)

[SuperChrono]

Which dimension IS magic? cause i wanna go there please :)

[7ito1990]

@RedZoneProducts the one that fills your sould experience's needs the most. Whatever you already feel with your mind and heart you already know, you don't need so much to experuence, besides the healthy state factor

[Lucky466]

What i don't get is how if a dimension has no height at all, then how can you even stack things on top of eachother? how could you even see "cross sections" with a 3D object passing through the 2nd dimension if you have absolutely no height? because in the 3rd dimension it's impossible for an object to have absolutely no height, so in other words there can only be 3 dimensional objects in a 3D world. We can imagine the same for the 2D world, but then how could they see cross sections at all?

[JerrysFunhouse]

This guy is just a character I created in my SIMS game. Oh and so are you.