Crysis GTX 460 Very High

Gameplay from Crysis
Very High
No Anti Aliasing
Windowed
1680 x 1050

Full Spec:
Case: NZXT Tempest EVO
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition (C3 stepping) (OC to 3.8GHz)
CPU Cooler: Thermaltake Frio (using both 120mm fans)
GPU: MSI N460 GTX Cyclone 1GB (OC to 850MHz)
MOBO: ASRock 890 GM Pro3 890GX
RAM: Crucial 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz Ballistix, CL8(8-8-8-24) 1.65V Unbuffered Non-ECC
HDD: Western Digital 640GB Hard Drive SATAII 7200rpm 32MB Cache - OEM Caviar Black
Fans: 2 x 120mm fans (side & rear), 2 x 2 120mm blue LED fans (front), 2 x 2 140mm fans (top)
Lights: 6x 12" Sharkoon Blue Cold Cathodes & 1x Nexos Blue LED Light Strip
PSU: Corsair TX 650W
Fan Controller: NZXT Sentry 2 (touchscreen)

Sharkoon X-Tatic 5.1 Digital Headset

Panasonic 32" 1080p HD Viera LCD TV TX32LZD80
LG 20" TFT monitor Flatron L204WS

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• crysis
• warhead
• geforce
• nvidia
• gtx
• 460
• msi
• cyclone
• very
• high
• maxed
• out
• max
• anti
• aliasing
• overclock
• phenom
• 955
• thermaltake
• frio
• crucial
• corsair
• sli
• quad
• triple
• tri
• crossfire
• ati
• radeon
• HD
• 1080
• 1680
• 1050
• settings
• ultra
• maximum
• clock
• speed
• strength
• devmode
• silencer
• rifle
• sniper
• scar
• scope
• headshot
• missile
• rocket
• korean
• us
• fraps
• fps
• processor
• CPU
• GPU
• graphics
• panasonic
• viera
• lg
• 32
• AMD

[spunkflunk]

i now think it might have something to do with haveing amd proccesor with an nvidia card. I should prob have a radeon card or ati.

[SplodgeOfCheese]

@spunkflunk Lol no. That is just a myth.

[spunkflunk]

i got a gtx 560 and if i max out this game with that res i get like 12fps. WTF?!

[SplodgeOfCheese]

@spunkflunk Anti Aliasing? CPU Bottleneck? Doing something in the background?

[spunkflunk]

@SplodgeOfCheese well i gota have AA on to make it look better. and i dont see how im bottlenecking my cpu, i got an amd athlon x4 645 3.1ghtz quad core, and i got 6gbs of ddr3 ram, got a brand new 520w psu which is more than enough for my card

[SplodgeOfCheese]

@spunkflunk Well AA takes a big chunk out of your fps.

You won't be bottlenecking your CPU, but your CPU may be bottlenecking your graphics card (I am not sure about this).

Are you using three sticks of RAM? I thought it was better to run it dual channel (2 sticks). Only i7 supports triple channel.

[SplodgeOfCheese]

@coolmnk Id say 460 if you get the money. A 5770 is slightly better value performance, but the 460 handles DX11 much better and has better drivers and is faster and OC like a beast.

[BassPounderX]

your oc isnt stable i gt better fps on stock at 1080p aa on 4 veryhigh with a old amd athlon x2 @ 2.6

[george3dmax]

@spunkflunk i remember i had a problem with my old motherboard, it wasn't qualified motherboard for my proccessor so it ran at 2.27 GHZ it was q9550 and me too, i got same fps even on low of lowest settings. after i changed to qualified motherboard proccessor eventually started functioning properly and i could overclock this to 3.2. problem solved.

[Krazykilo424]

i use a asus g53sw to play this game. 460m is overclocked to 800/1600/1510. i play with everything on max, but the shader is on high. the shader is what eats my fps. so try that out. see if it works for ya.

[spunkflunk]

@SplodgeOfCheese omg it got worse. it seemed to increase precess withdraw the more i played. i had to keep turning down the settings. eventually it was all on low/ 1280x960 and i was getting average 30fps but in combat it would drop to 21fps, and this is in lowst settings. wtf! i can play BF3 on ultra but i cant play crysis on medium settings now?

[Tobiash87]

@ItztehDarklehcat No.