Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, said the Israeli settlement building issue remains on the top of the all negotiation meetings with the Israelis.
The talks have been restarted on final status issues after the Annapolis conference in the US last month but very little has been achieved.
@brick4sale israel run usa
radomaxx 1 year ago
jews are a bunch of blood sucking parasites. They should be kicked out of America for ruining our economy and using our country to fight their wars.
TheTrueDavid 1 year ago
If USA cannot try the GTMO detainees for 1929 or 1949 Geneva Convention violations then only Hague Conventions to work with because they do not meet the qualifications for Genocide Convention & Principles of Nuremberg violations
1929 Geneva" Art. 2. Prisoners of war are in the power of the hostile Government, but not of the individuals or formation which captured them. ... Measures of reprisal against them are forbidden
Where Bush43 Adm proposes the exact opposite of art 2
vistavision2 2 years ago
USA GTMO Military Commissions are a disaster because Bush 43 Admn pursued to circumvent LOAC through its bullshit "enemy prisoner of war [EPW} " detainee designation. Is there any other kind but enemy POW's?
"Detainee" sound familiar? It should its an Israeli euphemism for extra-judicial imprisonment.
Again what is the purpose fo LOAC if not to provision level playing field; protections to civilians, non-combatants, & combatants; and to FACILTATE peace through regulated warfare
vistavision2 2 years ago
OR Parties may either prosecute through their respectibe civil jurisprudential system: IF, it has the legal authority to do so; Case Example- Saddam Tribunal or Norway's recently enacted laws.
OR the UN may establish a Tribunal under the the auspices of the Interanational Criminal Court (ICC) which is also conflict specific.
GENEVA War Crimes Tribunals MUST convene in the territory WHERE the person is captured, e.g., State where conflict happened.
USA GTMO is a disaster!!!
vistavision2 2 years ago
Vrael, International law is contractual law
Military Tribunals: Parties to the conflict may establish respective or Joint Military Commissions as in Nuremeberg & Tokyo Triibunals
War Crime Tribunals are conflcit specific; do NOT have appeals due to the fact that once adjurned are finito forever; penalty is what Commission determines
Penalty is usually death becuase a live prisoner may opt to pursue political, legal, or propaganda appeals-No one wants to deal with that
vistavision2 2 years ago
Ive read the Article 49 that you refer to and it is clear that Israel is in breach of each part. My next question then is, what are the penalties for failure to follow article 49. When i read it Article 49 did not state what the penalties are.
Vrael473 2 years ago
Vsrael,
I a 13 year old or older child of the settler parents can ask such questions on War Crimes then that 14 year can distingquish between lawful & unlawful, e.g., War Crime, activity and should of his/her own accord goto the Israeli authorities and petition to be removed from their War Criminal parents home of either being appointed a Legal Guardian, placed in Foster Care. become a Ward of the State, or given Emancipation.
18 year birhtdate: That person is a WAR CRIMINAL
vistavision2 2 years ago
Vsrael. your 2nd Q
No, only adults are to be tried for War Crimes with minors being removed from their War Criminal Israeli parents who are mentally abusing thier own children by using them as human shields in the process of their WAR CRIMES of PLUNDER .
Do you propose that if parents engaged in crinial activityof systemically entering other p[eople's homes to commit armed robbery of the occupants thrugh murder should NOT be prosectued because they have children with them?
vistavision2 2 years ago
Vsrael, Answer your PM
Word "civilian" is a military term that equates with "Protected Person" but Niether ais combatant nor non-combatant
I-973 Geneva Article 49 defines importation of one's citizenry as War Crime & said person are EXCLUDED as protected persons: Therefore, Israeli settlers are NOT civilians but War Criminals & can be killed should they offer resistance
Its comparable international law context [plunder] to domestic "looter" who can be killed on shoot on sight
vistavision2 2 years ago