The Degradation of Sarah Palin (Going Rouge) (part 1)
Uploader Comments (DixonRants)
All Comments (11)
-
Sarah palin is one of the most disgracefull and idiotic individuals in poilitics, the female equivalent of george W. bush.
-
Well resigning as governor really only proves she is not fit to hold any important government office, she had no legitimate reason for quitting she just decided to give up on her state. Quit complaining about CO2 emissions it is for the better. Insurance companies will be pressed with 'competition' sound familiar, you can just look at colleges, state funding hasn't destroyed all other colleges in America, basically don't get yourself all worked up, conservative leaders are trying to scare you.
-
@dgonz26868 thank you for making dixon look stupid and saving me the time of degrading this video. people like this dixon are starting to piss me off.
-
"I believe that that started this "chain reaction"
So does that (in your view) invalidate her belief in small government, low taxes & other fiscal conservative principles?
"filthy rich at the expense of the middle and lower classes"
If by "expense" you mean by employing them, why not? How else is the middle/lower classes supposed to earn a living?
"carbon emissions"
We already have pollution standards. But CO2 is now a greenhouse gas, are we also to be taxed for breathing?
First off, point 1 has zero relevance to her political views. Or the refutation thereof.
As far her endorsing Hoffman because Scozzafava, was too liberal, well she DID endorse the democrat candidate after it became clear she was trailing...Btw, the textbook definition of Liberal you use is FAR from what THIS crop of liberal democrats is living by. Unless you consider wealth caps, CO2 taxes , bans & nationalization of industries to be a step forward. Funny that you left out freedom...
dgonz26868 2 years ago
The first point I believe had relevance because I believe that that started this "chain reaction", if you will.
So you really believe that people should be able to get filthy rich at the expense of the middle and lower classes? You really believe that companies should be able to spew carbon emissions into the air for free?
And you'd have to give me a specific example of a nationalizing industry. If you use Insurance Companies as your example, then I will laugh.
And what freedoms r infringd
DixonRants 2 years ago
"specific example of a nationalizing industry"
The nation's largest loaning agencies are now under the direct control of administration appointed people. Same for GM. Both companies should have been allowed to fail. As for the medical insurance companies...Well, if you think there'll be any besides the Fed, in the next 10 yrs (assuming the HCR passes), you're in for a suprise.
"what freedoms r infringd"
This was part of a new sentence I thought I'd deleted. My bad.
dgonz26868 2 years ago
First off, I disagree with a lot of her principles in politics. For example, I believe that a federal government is necessary to preserve the peace. Also, I was referring to the fact that some people take advantage of the fact that they are rich, which ends up hurting a lot more people. Take the CEO's of United Health care, CIGNA, ect.
And I believe that companies shouldn't just be allowed to pollute a lot of emissions. It's absurd. I don't necessarily believe in "global warming", but we breath
DixonRants 2 years ago
...this air.
As far as the Bailouts, I believe that they were not handled that well. But you can't blame that on Obama, it was President Bush who signed that one into law, supported by Palin (which she now denies. lol)
DixonRants 2 years ago
"I believe that a federal government is necessary to preserve the peace"
No one's talking about removing the fed. But growing it larger each year produces little beyond increased buracacy & larger bills. As for crooked CEOs, there is no defence. They're crooks & should be dealth with. No one's arguing against that either.
As for pollution, again yes. We all have to breath. But doesn't strangling industry and putting millions out of work only replace one problem with another?
dgonz26868 2 years ago
"But doesn't strangling industry and putting millions out of work only replace one problem with another?"
How? Do you seriously believe that taxing pollution would end up in the firing of of "millions"?
DixonRants 2 years ago