Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Degradation of Sarah Palin (Going Rouge) (part 1)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
140 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 24, 2009

DixonRants fanpage:

http://www.tinyurl.com/dixonrantsfanpage

In this video, I describe the three part process of the former Alaskan Governor/former Vice Presidential nominee's degradation among the average American citizen. It can be easily explained in three parts.

1: Her resignation from being the Alaskan Governor.

2: Her endorsement of Doug Hoffman, the "Conservative" candidate that was put on their because of Palin's, and the rest of the Republican's party's, dislike over the fact that Dede Scozzafava, the Republican candidate, was apparently to "Liberal".

3: Her outrageous claims that she recently made (and continue to make, so keep your ears peeled) in her new book/memoir "Going Rouge: An American Life", along with other rash statements that she continues to make on talk shows/commentary shows/news networks.

Yet despite these outrageous facts that I describe in this two-part video, "FAUX News" and Rush Limbaugh continue to treat her as if she is credible (well, what do you expect? She is one of them, after all).

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (DixonRants)

  • First off, point 1 has zero relevance to her political views. Or the refutation thereof.

    As far her endorsing Hoffman because Scozzafava, was too liberal, well she DID endorse the democrat candidate after it became clear she was trailing...Btw, the textbook definition of Liberal you use is FAR from what THIS crop of liberal democrats is living by. Unless you consider wealth caps, CO2 taxes , bans & nationalization of industries to be a step forward. Funny that you left out freedom...

  • The first point I believe had relevance because I believe that that started this "chain reaction", if you will.

    So you really believe that people should be able to get filthy rich at the expense of the middle and lower classes? You really believe that companies should be able to spew carbon emissions into the air for free?

    And you'd have to give me a specific example of a nationalizing industry. If you use Insurance Companies as your example, then I will laugh.

    And what freedoms r infringd

  • "specific example of a nationalizing industry"

    The nation's largest loaning agencies are now under the direct control of administration appointed people. Same for GM. Both companies should have been allowed to fail. As for the medical insurance companies...Well, if you think there'll be any besides the Fed, in the next 10 yrs (assuming the HCR passes), you're in for a suprise.

    "what freedoms r infringd"

    This was part of a new sentence I thought I'd deleted. My bad.

  • First off, I disagree with a lot of her principles in politics. For example, I believe that a federal government is necessary to preserve the peace. Also, I was referring to the fact that some people take advantage of the fact that they are rich, which ends up hurting a lot more people. Take the CEO's of United Health care, CIGNA, ect.

    And I believe that companies shouldn't just be allowed to pollute a lot of emissions. It's absurd. I don't necessarily believe in "global warming", but we breath

  • ...this air.

    As far as the Bailouts, I believe that they were not handled that well. But you can't blame that on Obama, it was President Bush who signed that one into law, supported by Palin (which she now denies. lol)

  • "I believe that a federal government is necessary to preserve the peace"

    No one's talking about removing the fed. But growing it larger each year produces little beyond increased buracacy & larger bills. As for crooked CEOs, there is no defence. They're crooks & should be dealth with. No one's arguing against that either.

    As for pollution, again yes. We all have to breath. But doesn't strangling industry and putting millions out of work only replace one problem with another?

  • "But doesn't strangling industry and putting millions out of work only replace one problem with another?"

    How? Do you seriously believe that taxing pollution would end up in the firing of of "millions"?

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sarah palin is one of the most disgracefull and idiotic individuals in poilitics, the female equivalent of george W. bush.

  • Well resigning as governor really only proves she is not fit to hold any important government office, she had no legitimate reason for quitting she just decided to give up on her state.  Quit complaining about CO2 emissions it is for the better. Insurance companies will be pressed with 'competition' sound familiar, you can just look at colleges, state funding hasn't destroyed all other colleges in America, basically don't get yourself all worked up, conservative leaders are trying to scare you.

  • @dgonz26868 thank you for making dixon look stupid and saving me the time of degrading this video. people like this dixon are starting to piss me off.

  • "I believe that that started this "chain reaction"

    So does that (in your view) invalidate her belief in small government, low taxes & other fiscal conservative principles?

    "filthy rich at the expense of the middle and lower classes"

    If by "expense" you mean by employing them, why not? How else is the middle/lower classes supposed to earn a living?

    "carbon emissions"

    We already have pollution standards. But CO2 is now a greenhouse gas, are we also to be taxed for breathing?

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more