Re: Leaving MONTANA for freedom in New Hampshire?

Sponsor: http://FreeKeene.com - Rich Angel was a major freedom fighter in Montana until he decided there was more liberty to be had in the "Free State"
This is part 28c of our "Moving to New Hampshire" series.

If you want to commission an ad like the one in this video, the cost as of 7/08 is three cents per video view. But views after the first week are free, and your hyperlink in the video descrip is free. Message me through this site or e-mail me: RidleyReport at live period com

Additional Keywords: dave ridley report ron paul revolution ridleyreport free state project new hampshire libertarian party freedom secession independence united states u.s. constitution constitutionalist market anarchist anarchism anarchy talk live ed brown elaine brown marketeer liberty republican democrat mary ruwart bob barr michael badnarik staters don't taze me bro taser tazer hunter s. thompson government paulville gun rights guns fascism communism secede civil disobedience law federal reserve department of homeland security feds fed sovereign tyranny tyrrany irs john lynch taxation taxes tax real id rebellion police abuse independent indie media new gonzo journalism campaign for liberty live free or die nh moving to new hampshire part 28a rich angel montana live free or die festival jaffrey celebration

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• ron
• paul
• free
• state
• project
• new
• hampshire
• bob
• barr
• Montana
• Governor
• Brian
• Schweitzer

[RidleyReport]

the supreme court is that bunch who said the government can take your land for the purpose of selling it to a private convention center.  Their rulings are not super respected around here.

[fczwartek]

Tell me if I've got this straight then; Libertarians can cite Supreme Court cases when the appear to support the Libertarian agenda.

But as soon as the "appearance of support" crumbles away Libertarians simply dismiss the Supreme Court as another corrupt gvmnt institution.

Although I agree with you the using public domain to transfer private land to richer private hands is definitely wrong.

[RidleyReport]

different libertarians have different thoughts on these matters. To me, the courts don't have much credibility. But government workers are expected to take them seriously, and often don't. That's hypocritical on their part.

[fczwartek]

Why not just go and get a license? I just don't get it. 40,000+ car crash related deaths every year....

I'm not saying you're a bad driver Rich but apparently you lack good judgment because you are going to go to jail over this.

How is it worth it? What are you trying to prove or gain?

[RidleyReport]

he's trying to prove that you advocate initiated violence.

[LordBicen]

Live free... OR DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[LumpyRevolution]

Traveling IS driving just as much as if you were on a bicycle, covered wagon, moped, train, taxi, the back of an ass, or what have you... is it not? Jeesh! It seems like you want to argue for the sake of arguing. I'd rather not do that. Life is too short for that amigo.

[LumpyRevolution]

That is precisely why I'm moving to New Hampshire ASAP!

Thank you for reminding me Dave!

[LumpyRevolution]

I've read your other comments; I still think there's hope for you in spite of what you wrote. Of course that was cut & paste. What of it? It doesn't make it any less important did it? No, you didn't say squat about "international travel" so don't expect me to read your mind on your imaginary items please; thank you. Do you suspect Kent v Dulles was only a problem because he claimed Federal Citizenship therefore giving up natural rights inherent to living souls only or am I over your head again?

[fczwartek]

Find a supreme court case or act of congress that specifically says it is unconstitutional for states to require car drivers to be licensed.

I'm not talking about restricting travel to other countries by denying a passport due to political affiliation (Kent v Dulles.)

[fczwartek]

Dude, I did read what "you" wrote and I did enough research on it to know that you didn't write it. It's a lousy cut and paste job.

Let's talk about Kent v Dulles (for example.) This case has nothing to do with driving a car. Nothing. Let me repeat that for clarity- Nothing!

The case is about the government denying Kent a passport to travel to England because he was an alleged communist.

I am talking about driving. You are talking about traveling.

[fczwartek]

Limiting the power of government is the corollary of granting rights to the citizen.