Brunswick Twisted Fury / Fury Pearl Comparison

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
41,617
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 21, 2007

The Twisted Fury / Fury Pearl Comparison from videoballreviews.com!

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I hate it when people say this ball does not hook much. This ball can hook alot on the right conditions. The core/cover combo allow bowlers to play closer to friction, which means you are further right than most, but I still move left because of the drill on mine

  • Non reactive balls = Plastic = no hook potential (unless there are no oil on the lanes)

    Reactive Balls = Non Plastic = Creates friction which causes the ball to hook. Also, there are different assortment of reactive balls depending the material the ball is covered with and the shape of the core inside.

see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i have a twisted fury pearl, and a maxxx zone, and also the c system 3.5 and let me tell you all balls are drilled different and ALL do exactly the same for me! for a time i thought it was me but then bought the motiv cruel and darn it hooks a lot with the same effort and layout that the c system, then i tried the invasion storm and a little more strong than the cruel. i have to say this sadly, brunswick wont work for you unless you are a stroker like walter ray. it simply wont help you on hook.

  • I thow the same shot with my twisted fury.

  • Hook potential depends on the bowler, not the ball. Most people fall short of the ball's actual rating (which is based off a cranker throwing high revs).

  • i have a black widow pearl, a cell pearl, and a jolt particle. i was thinking of getting a FURY. should i

  • k thx

  • what is the difference between a reactive ball and non reactive ball?/ please help. i no i suck at bowling

  • brunswick is good but roto grip is taking 2009 over.

  • haha brunswick was strugglin for a while. but im thinking the furys are pretty much the shit. i shot my first 300 with the solid.

  • The problem isnt the ball,its the bowler

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more