Raw Video of Fatal Accident: Cop Kills Two Teens in Car Wreck (w/ Slo-Mo & COPS Theme Music)

W/ Cops Theme Music. Raw Fatal Footage of Police Officer Jason Anderson crashing into and killing 19-year-old David Servin and 19-year-old Ashlie Krakowski on June 13. Anderson was driving 94 mph and did not have his lights or siren on. Even worse, the officer was not responding to a call and had no reason to be speeding. Anderson is charged with two counts of second-degree manslaughter and one count of reckless driving.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Raw
• video
• footage
• drunk
• cop
• police
• office
• corrupt
• abuse
• bad
• lies
• paid
• leave
• wreck
• raw
• fatal
• death
• dead
• car
• accident
• extremely
• Milford
• Connecticut
• david
• letterman
• jimmy
• fallon
• kimmel
• two
• kids
• pile
• up
• worlds
• worst
• ever
• drinking
• beer
• alcohol
• speeding
• 94mph
• best
• government
• evil
• jay
• leno
• today
• show
• tonight
• conan
• brian
• ap
• magazine

[aljohnson2u]

@Redleg171 It was a hypothetical question based on CyanoticFuture's theory. Personally, I think if you do anything at all that inhibits your ability to have the best control of your own vehicle, then if you get in an accident you are just as much at fault NO MATTER what the other driver was doing. You cannot put total blame on the other driver because you think they did something 'more' illegal or in your opinion 'more' wrong.

[Redleg171]

@aljohnson2u Yes, he does.

[GingerSnowSpice]

abuse of authority.

[aljohnson2u]

@CyanoticFuture No, it's not rare for an impaired person to die in a wreck. A drunk person is more lucid, but impaired doesn't make you invincible. Your judgement and reaction time is slowed down, but you don't go limp just because you're buzzed. And at 94, it doesn't matter if you're drunk, buzzed, stoned, sober or tired. You're just dead. Reason you're dead is BOTH because your vision is impaired and the cop was doing 94. He drove into the lane. The cop should do life though.

[aljohnson2u]

@CyanoticFuture You can try your argument any way you want. It doesn't matter. The teens drinking impaired their driving. That ultimately put them at risk at every corner and every intersection.

[aljohnson2u]

@CyanoticFuture Let's say just for arguments sake, that the teen pulled across in front of someone doing 45(the posted limit) and they were close enough that there was still an accident. The other driver just happened to look down at his stereo right before impact. That guy breaks his leg. Does he deserve a broken leg just because he looked down at the radio?

[CyanoticFuture]

@aljohnson2u Its actually rare , rarer than people realize, for a truly impaired person to be killed in a wreck.I know this, any research on drunk driving shows this.That tells you.1. Those kids likely werent as impaired as youd believe.especially if the driver was killed also (driver side wasnt hit ) 2. Cop was going so fast he killed 2 drunks.That alone is incredible and tells you even a sober person,if these kids werent sober themselves,cant react in time to a 94 MPH vehicle.

[CyanoticFuture]

@aljohnson2u Maybe so.But you take the odds by getting in a car period. Doesnt mean it should cost you your life because someone elsedoesnt know the first thing about the laws of physics or road driving.Actually, if you drink before driving,you increase your survival chances.Your body is more relaxed, doesnt tense up before impact.This is an actual fact.If you are impaired, youll increase the chances of a wreck,but not decrease your survival odds. strange, but true.

[elbeghast]

Things like this are why I hate cops...all cops.