GRZ 34 - D&D 4E Monster Roles

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,685
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2008

Chris Perkins joins Gamer Zer0 and spends the entire episode talking about the D&D 4th Edition Monster Manual, specifically all the diffent monster roles.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Have you played it, or are you just presuming? If you have played it, could you be a little more descriptive of why it sucks? If you're just presuming, well, I am skeptical too, but I'm at least going to give it a fair look before I count it out. ::shrug::

  • good info. love 4E, by the way. keep up the good work.

    VS

see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if you are willing to put in house rules for hp gain of tanks and different bonuses for other classes (such as the cleric can make a heal check to use extra healing surges and a healing surge that a cleric grants can get knocked out characters - 0 hp back to 1 hp) it can overcome the fact that it is overbalanced, but that is better then the underbalanced other versions.

  • I glad they fixed minions.

  • love 4th ed keep up the great work wotc

  • negatives for telling the truth. DAMN!!! lol

  • Cool.. I have no problem with you not liking the game i over reacted my self. In your first post i felt like you insulted a person i know and happen to have alot of respect for. I am sorry for name calling and all the bull crap that has been posted. Once again i have no problem with you not liking the game and i am all for you playing any version of the game. The first insulting comment is all that set me off but that is not a reason to be a jerk. sorry

  • hey eberron13 i was not happy after the last post from ether of us im not a man of hate in words or action i just felt that you were unjustly mean to me after my first post and i over reacted from then on. lets start over i think the new DND was not very good in fact i think it stinks i will play 3.5 instead if you are offended by this lest me know why

  • I told u to shut the hell up yea u posted the dumbass jonson joke then i called u a retard and i hate to say it if the shoe fits you might want to put it on. Now all i am saying is that if you are going to post a opinion about writing and designing you should be able to spell that helps with the credibility. If you think it is so bad lets see the stuff you have designed but please be sure to use spell check if you post it.

  • you are pissed off i just posted that i think the new dnd was crappy and poorly made and you called me a retard and told me to "shut the hell up" i never attacked you until you or your posts if you like the new dnd post why dont just call me names. i read the new dnd before i posted here and i do have poor spelling when i dont spell check it but it is the ideas not the spelling that matter

    ps you realy sound like a jerk

  • Why such a retard tarboy62. Im not pissed its just funny that people who are not smart enough to spell or type seem to think that other people want to hear their lame ass opinion. Also good second grade come back with the small dick joke man you are really good. Do all the people who are smart enough to type and spell right a favor and stop posting cause all you do is lower your own intelligence by posting.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more