superhornet takeoff on an aircraft carrier
Top Comments
All Comments (16)
-
YEAH! Gun Slingers! They should put Yosemite Sam on the tails.
-
@BikerYamahaR1 It was, problem is that their maintenance costs were so much higher. It cost more money to keep them flying than the active aircraft today.
-
@BikerYamahaR1 yea highway to the dangerzone doesnt really fly with the f-18. dont mind the pun
-
@BikerYamahaR1 I've always wondered that. Since the Tomcat was Grumman and the Rhinos are Boeing, if this was indeed a better jet. I mean I thought the Navy only recently got those F-14D Super Tomcats. Methinks the F-18E/Fs were just a cheaper alternative...
-
it was better at IT'S role(air superiority)than the Super Hornet, but it is no where near as versatile...Still they should have gone ahead with the "super-tomcat 21" program, so every carrier could have a squadron of advanced air superiority fighters...for top cover missions, the role that the F-14 SHINED...BTW I did 'thumbs-up' your comment :)
-
the f14 was much better ...
Awesome! Thanks for posting this!
socomsniper784 4 years ago 5
@OneSkiWonder stop feeding israel with our money and feed USA,israel is damaging THE USA
BikerYamahaR1 9 months ago 3