Common sense is lauded as a virtue. But is it really?
Only within the narrow range of experiences we grow up with. It's often more harmful than helpful in the scientific process.
How far should ...
Common sense is lauded as a virtue. But is it really? Only within the narrow range of experiences we grow up with. It's often more harmful than helpful in the scientific process.
How far should we trust common sense? When does it steer us wrong? Why do we find common sense so appealing?
Please feel free to share in the comments your own favorite counter-intuitive scenario that is nevertheless true.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Merriam Webster: Sound judgement based upon what is seen as knowledge held by people "in common", rather than esoteric study or research.
In practical terms, the Internet is filled with arguments that appeal to people's experiential knowledge. "How can slime turn into a man?" "How can something come from nothing?" and the like. Our experiences are only valid in a very narrow range of natural phenomena.
Scientific methodologies reject common experiential knowledge in favor of evidence.
Common sense made us say "the earth is flat". Common sense made us say "The earth is centre of the universe as everythings is pulled in its center". Common sense makes us say that a feather falls more slowly than a rock, while indeed they all fall at the same equally accelerated speed, and it's air that cheats us.
Common sense is dangerous, as it makes you think you have the answer while infact you don't. It's pretty dangerous.
On the other hand try applying common sense to telling which mushrooms are poisonous and which are not. If you don't ahve experience with mushroom hunting and haven't grown up around mushroom hunters you better be sure to use science not common sense. Common sense only applies to common expeience.
Common sense is limited by our senses, experience, attention, brain capacity and innate biases built into our brain. If we use instruments to extend our senses, experiments to perceive new events, paper and computers to extend the capacity of our brains, psychology math and logic to help overcome our biases we extend our ability to understand and come to know a bigger and bigger universe. Apples and pears are reliably part of common experience so commons sense works.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
But aren't common sense and logic the same thing?
Sound judgement based upon what is seen as knowledge held by people "in common", rather than esoteric study or research.
In practical terms, the Internet is filled with arguments that appeal to people's experiential knowledge. "How can slime turn into a man?" "How can something come from nothing?" and the like. Our experiences are only valid in a very narrow range of natural phenomena.
Scientific methodologies reject common experiential knowledge in favor of evidence.
Common sense is dangerous, as it makes you think you have the answer while infact you don't. It's pretty dangerous.
To you reason is ignorant to me reason is Common Sense