This is a video that I took of the Planes of Fame Museum's (Chino, California) Northrop N9MB Flying Wing while performing a display at the Palm Springs Air Museum in 2006. This aircraft was painst...
This is a video that I took of the Planes of Fame Museum's (Chino, California) Northrop N9MB Flying Wing while performing a display at the Palm Springs Air Museum in 2006. This aircraft was painstakingly restored over a 13-year period.
As part of the November 1941 contract that Northrop was awarded for the proposed XB-35 Flying Wing included the construction of four, 1/3-scale aircraft, designated N9M, that were to act as flying test beds for various flight systems and also to familiarize Air Force pilots with flying-wing operations. The Planes of Fame Flying Wing in this video is one of those aircraft, and the only one remaining. Aviation greats such as Jack Northrop himself, Chuck Yeager and Bob Hoover actually flew this exact aircraft. I understand that this aircraft has a lot of idiosyncrasies that every pilot that ever flew her fell prey to, with interesting results!
Unfortunately, this aircraft experienced an in-flight engine fire just a short time after this video was taken in its left, 300 hp., 8-cylinder Franklin 0-540-7 engine. Pilot Ron Hackworth skillfully landed the aircraft safely. The Flying Wing has since been pretty much restored, but the restoration of the rare Franklin 0-540-7 engine is another matter. There were only about 27 of these engines ever built and it is believed that only three of them exist today. The needed parts may be newly manufactured as necessary, but the factory drawings are needed. They have not yet been located to my knowledge, as of Nov. 2007.
NOVEMBER 2009 UPDATE: New cylinder heads are being manufactured for these engines. Not a simple nor inexpensive task. Once the engine rebuilds are under way, this aircraft will once again fly, and not in the too distant future! But in the meantime, enjoy the rare video of this historic aircraft!
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
No, as of November 2009 this aircraft is not yet flying after experiencing an engine fire in 2006. The engines in this aircraft are very rare 300-horsepower Franklin 0-540-7, 8-cylinder engines. Both engines are in need of rebuilding. Of the 27 of these engines originally built only 3 are known to still exist and two of them are on this aircraft. New cylinder heads are needed for the rebuilds. HOWEVER, new cylinder heads are currently being manufactured from scratch.
the original concept came from austria and the hortens had their first prototypes flying in the early 30's. the final one from 1942 is stored and rusting near washington DC and would put northropp's "copy" to shame. there was a documentary showing the horten prototypes flying on TV. my jaw literally dropped open seeing it.
some people just have a hard time admitting that the germans and austrians developed and even made this concept stable. it is a known fact that northropp needed in the 80's 6 fridge-sized computers due to stability issues to have their bomber flying well. even RC models fly better than the northropp planes. furtheron the prototype and the construction papers were stolen and available to northropp and "they did not understand it" was one of the hortens last statement in the 90's about it.
dogsbd, the fact is, that northrop worked on Horten prototypes to design the B-2, wich iwas clearly inspired by it.
the YB 35 and YB-49 were never used because they were poorly designed, while the Ho 229 could out-speed and out-turn the best jet fighter of its time the Me 262, and even came close to Göring's 1000-1000-1000 doctrine.
I hate the way you guys can't just admit that german technology was waaay ahead of US. Nearly everything they create even nowadays is based on nazi technologies.
By "worked on" I assume you mean studied. But, do you know this for a fact? It wouldn't be unusual however, all companies study previous works in their field. The Hortens didn't work in a vacuum either, I'll bet they studied what they could find of Jack Northrops flying wing designs. The Northrop YB bombers were excellent aircraft, politics killed them not design issues. And the US P80 was a better fighter than the Me262, so much for Nazi superiority.
the US P80 was a better fighter than the Me262" better at what than which version of the 262 ? Besides, on which facts do you base that statement ? Plus the nazis had lots of other prototypes which they were working on and most of them were quite impressive in a technical point of wiew.
And no, the YB bombers were no excellent bombers, they had no precision in bombing do to stability issues.
Top speed: Me 262 A-1a - 550mph / P80A- 600mph Initial climb: Me 262 A-1a -3937 fpm / P80A- 4580 fpm Sustained Climb: Me 262 A-1a - 6.8 mins to 19,685 ft / P80A- 5.5 minutes to 20,000 ft Service ceiling: Me 262 A-1a - 37,565 ft / P80A- 45,000 ft P80 also had a higher roll rate and could turn inside the Me262.
And Northrop had a yaw dampener that solved the YB49's "stability issues".
First flight: Me 262 A-1a 18 July 1942 / P80A 8 January 1944.
In 2 years many thing had changed. If you want to compare the P80 with a german plane, you'd better compare it with the prototypes and projects of the end of the war, like the Me 262 HG II and HG III, the Lippisch P.13a, Horten Ho XIII and so on..
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
the YB 35 and YB-49 were never used because they were poorly designed, while the Ho 229 could out-speed and out-turn the best jet fighter of its time the Me 262, and even came close to Göring's 1000-1000-1000 doctrine.
I hate the way you guys can't just admit that german technology was waaay ahead of US.
Nearly everything they create even nowadays is based on nazi technologies.
By "worked on" I assume you mean studied. But, do you know this for a fact? It wouldn't be unusual however, all companies study previous works in their field. The Hortens didn't work in a vacuum either, I'll bet they studied what they could find of Jack Northrops flying wing designs. The Northrop YB bombers were excellent aircraft, politics killed them not design issues. And the US P80 was a better fighter than the Me262, so much for Nazi superiority.
Besides, on which facts do you base that statement ?
Plus the nazis had lots of other prototypes which they were working on and most of them were quite impressive in a technical point of wiew.
And no, the YB bombers were no excellent bombers, they had no precision in bombing do to stability issues.
Initial climb: Me 262 A-1a -3937 fpm / P80A- 4580 fpm
Sustained Climb: Me 262 A-1a - 6.8 mins to 19,685 ft / P80A- 5.5 minutes to 20,000 ft
Service ceiling: Me 262 A-1a - 37,565 ft / P80A- 45,000 ft
P80 also had a higher roll rate and could turn inside the Me262.
And Northrop had a yaw dampener that solved the YB49's "stability issues".
In 2 years many thing had changed. If you want to compare the P80 with a german plane, you'd better compare it with the prototypes and projects of the end of the war, like the Me 262 HG II and HG III, the Lippisch P.13a, Horten Ho XIII and so on..