Bill Clinton's Big Budget Surplus Debunked

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
786 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 13, 2010

Bill Clinton looked like he was President again after Obama left him alone onstage to answer questions from reporters. The old myth of Bill Clinton's big budget surpluses has been revived by many commentators in the past few day but is debunked here by Maine Web News.

Category:

News & Politics

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MaineWebNews)

  • "Bill Clinton (democrat) was certainly better with the budget than the Bush's (both Republicans)."

    That is a quote from this video which you are claiming is designed to make democrats look bad. Clearly Clinton was better than anyone since him has been with the budget as this video makes clear.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Republicans Win! Democrats Can Suck It!
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You just said Bill Clinton lied about the surplus yet at 2:30 you use that very same chart.

  • Clinton also got a lot of fake tax revenue from the Dot-Com bubble.

  • According to the treasury the national debt still continued to rise in 1999:

    Date Dollar Amount

    09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06

    09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86

    09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43

    09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62

    ...

    There NEVER was a debt reduction in any Clinton year. The US LOST money every Clinton year.

  • Hey, 1.9 Billion is not a big surplus, but it's better than loosing money.

  • Surplus vs Deficit

  • treasurydirect.gov has all the facts you may need on how the national debt in calculated every year. please stop emailing me as well please. ive sent my final reply. Im not angry i just have had this same conversation alot over bill clinton on his wiki page. PolitiFact has one on this as well.

  • @jschmidt0676 Actually deficit/surplus are terms relating to a budget, those figures are total debt.

    You need a common reference point, i.e. 1990 dollars; as $1 in 1913 isn't = to $1 in 2001 Because of the time value of money, it's the very essence of capitalism.

    Your figures don't compare apples to apples, if you made $800/w in 1950 and I make $1000/w today, I'm not really making more then you did.

  • @cappercastro the debt did not go down. inflation has nothing to do with this at all. every year they report the deficit for that year and every year it went up. this info comes from the US treasury department at treasury-direct.

  • @jschmidt0676 FYI the national debt actually decreased in 1999-2000 as inflation must be factored in.

  • The only part of your video I object with; is that idea that somehow Clinton manipulated the books.

    While not putting any SS surplus into actually assets is stupid, that was the case since its inception; Clinton didn't change anything in this regard.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more