Orthodoxy & Scripture 2: Writing the New Testament
Uploader Comments (davidpwithun)
Video Responses
All Comments (33)
-
Marcium in 139 ad forced the Christians to move from the vengefull Jewish god of the old testament to a loving god of Jesus, His great two literary works, the Antithesis and later the Canon of books {which later become the new testament...
-
The more logical would be the Camel and not the Rope. The eye of the needle was a gate and where the Camel could not carry anything so it could enter through the gate, the Camel had to be off loaded to enter through the gate. Think about what Jesus was telling the rich man to do before following him.
-
I don't know why people always use the "eye of the needle" quote to prove the translation was first in Aramaic. The words in NT Greek are very close: kamila for Camel and Kamilo for rope or cable. The confusion was created from the Greek, not the Aramaic. It's probably that the word Kamilo was used for rope and someone confused it with a male camel.
-
Great video! God bless!
-
I didn't say we read the Apocalypse actually, and I'm not aware that it is read anywhere, my point was that it is a designated reading for some feasts, though I do not know which. What I meant when I mentioned my church's custom, was that we read the Acts of the Apostles on Easter, after vespers but before matins, entirely, and the apocalypse is designated by the typikon to be read in a similar fashion, but I donät know on which feast. If I find it out, I shall tell you.
There is good reason to believe that Revelation was written before 70 AD. A great defense of this is by Kenneth Gentry "Before Jerusalem Fell". There are other scholars who have believed this as well. Manly because of the internal evidence.
greglee20 1 year ago
@greglee20 I've seen some of the arguments before, and I think there are some good reasons, but I'm not convinced yet. I'll check out the book you recommended. Thanks!
davidpwithun 1 year ago
By the way you are slightly wrong about Revelations not being included in the lectionary. Because it is marked as the "Great Reading" for some feasts. The Great Reading is probably most familiar to us from the night of Easter, when the Acts of the Apostles are read in their entirety. I do not know if you are familiar with this custom, but here in Finland we do practise it. It is quite solemn actually and a great way to spend the fast before the Easter service too ;) Thanks for a great video!!!
psevdhome 2 years ago
I appreciate that correction. I found out about the Finnish Church's use of the Apocalypse after I made this video. The Coptic Church, I've read since I made this video, has a tradition very similar to that as well. The omission wasn't intentional, believe me!
davidpwithun 2 years ago
Speaking of dates!
I believe that Marks gospel was written down within 37 AD! This is because Mark never named Caiaphas by name, he only said high priest! I believe that Caiaphas was High priest under the time Mark wrote the gospel! And thats why Mark never named him by name!
HighCarro 2 years ago
Very interesting; I'll have to look into it more. Thanks for posting this!
davidpwithun 2 years ago