Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

DUNA TV Michelangelo Naddeo, interjú, Magyar Őshaza

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
34,096
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 11, 2008

www.michelangelo.cn magyar honfoglalás magyar rovásírás magyar régészet művészet vallás székelyföld ujgur uyghur uygur magyar tudományos akadémia szent korona

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (angelonaddeo)

  • etruscan question, Alinei opinion they were kugan uralic, my opinion they were from troy. trojans spoke a similar language as sumerians and subartuans. the 70% same between etr. and hung. is this. trojans in carpathia made eszter gom (ister gam) and sicambria. next they run to Italy s Etruscan. Francio and Paris trojans similar to France and Paris.

  • @HungarianHistory2 there is nowadays genetic evidence that confirms that the Etruscans came fro Anatolia. In Lemnos (the island in front of Troy) Hungarian archaeology has been found and they used an alphabet that is similar to the Etruscan one (Facchinetti).The Etruscan design of the Mother Isten had also come from Anatolia.The Hungarian capital, still used in Varese and Szekelyfold came from Ionia, west Anatolia.My evidence is in my website. What evidence you have that they made Esztergom?

  • about hungarian hunnic contact. we have nothing with xiongnu common people, but the rulers of the huns were r1a1 and u2e (mtdna).

    dienekes.blogspot.com/2010/01/­r1a1u2e-male-in-2000-year-old-­mongolian.html

  • @HungarianHistory He is the Duurlig Nars man, he was not the chief, but he was buried close to the chief, hence he had an influencial position in the community: cultural elite (thechnological slave) . He may have had the same position that later on the "technological slaves" of the Mongols had: Gengiz khan built a brick (no yurts!) closed village for them, as in USSR they would later do for their scientists

Top Comments

  • @aquario008 "Yeah, keep on deleting comments which don't agree with you.... you're a "true" scientist.... what a joke you are... Szekely disguised as an Italian (I believe you are actually a Jew)."

    I reply and publish only  to comments "consistently opposing my theory with evidence". I block the users who comments as racist barbars!

  • Amióta közzétettem ezt a videót, mindenféle kommentnek teret engedtem; tűrtem még a barbár vitákat is. Most eltávolítottam az összes régi bejegyzést és csak az elméletemet ellenző véleményekre adott válaszaimat engedem megjelenni, melyeket a Michelangelo.cn oldalon található bizonyítékok támasztanak alá. A magyarul írott kommentekre magyarul válaszolok. Hálás vagyok az elméletemet alátámasztó kommentekért, de ezek közül csak azokat hozom nyilvánosságra, amelyek további bizonyítékot nyújtanak.

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HungarianHistory2

    Kürt or Kubrat or Horvát (croatian??) is common ruler between hungarian and bulgar king list. He had 5 sons who migrated to different places after sabir-khazar attack. Alzeco to Italy, Kotrag to Volga, Kuber to Pannonia, Batbaján stayed at home and made blood unio with the sabirs Asparuk to Danube Bulgaria. The ugur is jüecsi maybee they spoke in magyar. the sabir is the magyar (mada, madai, median, mitanni) tribal name Magógs sons Magog-ar, folk name Szabartói (Subartuan)

  • @HungarianHistory2

    my problem with my theory: the MTDNA is from maternal line only, our grandys were different people from non magyar tribes. the blood contract between different tribes, and we had many. Jüecsi-Sabir, Sabir-Alan, and maybee Sabir-Mongol too. The name chuwash is from suwar, and early avars had a zabender tribe too, Szombathelys name is Savaria, azeri magyars were Szavárds, De Administrando about Sabartoi. Other question is the onogur-bulgar-hun realm made by Atillas son.

  • The Ancient hungarian MTDNA (tests by István Raskó and Erika Bogácsi Szabó, Szeged laboratory MTA)

    1. common people they were the pannonici (pan european markers from non slavo-germano-vlach tombs)

    2. classical homecoming ruler people

    -Middle Eastern (Nimrods area) my Sabiroi

    -Caucasus (Alanians)

    -Asia (joined türks (krluk like ujghur?)or early avars from 6th century Pannonia)

    these asians were 16-25% in classical tombs.

  • @HungarianHistory2 if you read whichever chinese book of archaeology you find out the Chinese named "Huns" all the peoples at their north and west borders! Some of them were blonds and they were Hungarians.

  • @HungarianHistory2 Today genetics is the most reliable tool for finding ancestors. The Magyars came back home from the Tarim basin: this is what genetics, archaeology, and cultural anthropology clearly say. Genetics, archaeology, cultural anthropology, and history clearly say that the Sarmatians and the Avars came from central Asia south and west of the tarim Basin.

  • @HungarianHistory DuurligNars man was Hungar "technological slave" (see "The Huns" when published).He descended from Pazyryki (same mutation pattern of R1a) arrived from Szekelyfold (buried with gold Mother Isten of same shape as Cucuteni) U2 was in EU since 30.000 BC (Kostienki)That research contaminated by"another"Mongolist: C.Mair, "Indo-Germanist"!

    Read: michelangelo.cn>magyar genetika>chapt X.>gen.researches 51. and 04.Hungar Sarmatians were"tech slaves" of Huns. Mongols were Mongols!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more