Climate Scientist Dr. Michael Oppenheimer on climate change

Thankyou for that good info. I hear conspiracy nuts on the radio. Take Care

Ok here is the deal since 1850 the majority of the scientific community has agreeded that co2 is a greenhouse gass that directly effects the climate and weather on earth..... and it is a fact that man does emit mass quanitys of co2 and other greenhouse gases..... so u can eather belive what the majority of scientist for the last 160 years or u can agree with the 2% who dnt agree with the other 98% the choice is yours

98% of the scientific comunity agree with them..... 2% of scientist dnt think global climate change isnt man made....

I love science. I have all my life. I just want real facts and good sound science.

@MrJohnnyrace Have you even looked at Oppenheimer's cv? Probably not. He's been doing research for a long time.

In the future, you should speak for yourself, not a mystery crowd.

Well, there have been those that have said this wasnt good science or a lot was not published delibritly. It makes a lot of people wonder if the Earth wouldnt have its own natural cycles. I agree reguardless of global warming, we dont need a larger hole than we already have in the ozone. I think thats a good reason the cancer rate has gone up. Among all the pesticides and other contaminates. I think we need an independant group of scientists other than these guys to do research.

You aren't going to find an independent group of scientists. The "A" team has been the first to go to work.

For example: when the Ozone Hole was first discovered, the scientists thought it must be an instrument error. It took some work to determine the instruments were playing the correct notes. The hole came first, then the reason and cause were discovered.

The best and brightest are finding things you don't want to know about.

But I read that the evidence was either not all given or they doctored the figures. They may be correct, but people are second guess them after hearing about things like that. Who isnt being honest?? Someone.

But, but, but! But what? What did you hear? That one proxy dataset suddenly diverged from the instrument record? The other proxies are not as easy to obtain as tree ring data. Maybe, it may be as important to find out why tree growth suddenly diverged from the instrument record.

That could be as exciting as discovering that W. Antarctica is mostly below sea level with up to a mile or more of ice sitting on it above sea level. One place is 8,233 ft below msl solid ice to the bottom.

Yes indeed 31,000 'scientist', not 31,000 climate researchers. Fun fact, to sign the petition, you only require a BD. I have a BD degree in sociology, so technically this would mean that I'm permitted to sign the petition. But what the hell do I know about climate change?