Joe Friendly with Prof Jim Fetzer 9/11 Truth 1st show 1st pt

Bio sketch of Jim Fetzer. Disscussing the Philosophy of Science and the discovery of laws of nature and how they differ from laws of society and how they relate to the destruction of the WTC.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• joe
• friendly
• jim
• fetzer
• 9/11
• truth

[ishredu]

damned 500 character limit!] also take note on how much damage these charges are doing yet the building still stands until the very last of the charges has finished exploding..giving people a better idea of exactly how much damage a building can take before it actually falls into it's own footprint. fascinating.

[joefriendly]

Yes, that is an important lesson from viewing the controlled demolition in New Haven. Pesty SkyKing185 tries to insist the collapse of the penthouse of Building 7 should be the start of the count, but that little collapse is but a revealing clue that some of the preperatory beam cutting had begun, before the big comedown in 6.5 seconds. Thanks again for pointing out the video.

[todd900]

why is the hippies hand on uncle fetzers lap?

[ishredu]

I would agree with that jet fuel just wouldn't burn hot enough long enough, while both buildings had a plane and fuel in them the actual damage done is clearly worlds apart yet the buildings fall exactly the same way...not likely. we agree. Joe, check out a video on my page called the new haven coliseum implosion. I was at this implosion and it is a great video because of the skeletal nature of the building allowing you to see exactly how implosions are set up and exploded!

[joefriendly]

ishredu, I agree the main point is how all three WTC buildings fell had to be controlled demolition not the nonsensical idea that such symmetrical collapse could be due to jet fuel fire softening steel. I was just maintaining that the demolition had to be set up in the month or so before 9/11, like in 911Mysteries it is pointed out that WTC Towers occupants were complaining there was unusual amounts of dust coming from the building's air vents in the month before.

[ishredu]

well I'll say this, these buildings certainly had help falling..any person with a modicum of common sense can see that as the case,for me it almost doesn't matter how they did it, just the fact that someone did do it and I find it insulting that this Govt. thinks we can be THAT STUPID! reading some of the comments I see they have in fact "fooled" some people. I think it's disgusting the Rudy AKA "the pimp" used some of the dead as pot hole filler I knew he was a bad man but wow!

[ishredu]

the official story is true? lol it's not even realistic, shit it isn't even possible! next time at least think before you make a comment

[joefriendly]

I have no information one way or another for the proposition you offer, that whole groups of tall buildings in a city are required to be wired to be so vulnerable to total annihilation, but my instincts urge it isn't so.

[ishredu]

hey Joe, dig this! about ten or so years ago I heard ALL sky scrapping buildings either in an inner city or simply surounded by other structures are ALL pre wired to implode..I heard this as i said ten years ago, do you think the "conspiracy" may just be trying to hide that fact? I would be interested in finding someone who actually knows if that is true or not...it does make sense to do that to control collateral damage caused perhaps by tornado's etc.

[joefriendly]

Lately, I have been considering that the Washington, DC firm, Booz, Allen, Hamilton was hired to make the arrangements, which would minimize the number of government employees involved in the 9/11 scam.

Booz Allen has among its employees a past director of the CIA. The firm apparently hired for the WTC demolition, Controlled Demolition, Inc did get the contract for the cleanup, so they could be counted on not to point to evidence of controlled demolition.