Polémica entre Nadal y Bernardes subtitulado.mp4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
16,299
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 26, 2010

Master de Londres. Nadal-Berdych. Polémica entre Nadal y Carlos Bernardes por un error del árbitro.

http://nacho.tv/polemica-en-el-partido-nadal-berdych-en-el-master-de-londres/

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THE DESCRIPTION PEOPLE PLIS!

    Master de Londres. Nadal-Berdych. Polémica entre Nadal y Carlos Bernardes por un error del árbitro.

  • It's a challenge from Berdych. Because Nadal returns the ball in, the point must be repeated.

  • @pingotas You're wrong. Nadal raises his hand but the umpire calls out, so the ball is OUT in that moment, there's no challenge. Then Berdych asks for challenge and the ball was in, so the point must be repeated, not for Berdych. The ball of Nadal was IN. Bernardes says the point is for Berdych because Nadal hits the ball out before he calls out, but that's a lie, the ball was in, so they must repeat the point. Sorry for my english.

  • That's what Bernardes get for being Rafa's little bitch and calling a ball out for the sole reason that Rafa called it out himself. Had he shut up and let Rafa challenge, it'd be fine. Had he seen the ball out himself and called it out like a minute sooner, it'd be ok as well.

    Carlos was like punishing Rafa for lying to him lol xD

  • @max095 No estás entendiendo lo que te digo. El partido EN EL MOMENTO EN EL CUAL SE FILMÓ ESTE VIDEO, Nadal estaba complicado. Que lo haya barrido después, es otra cosa. Lo felicito. Pero en los momentos en los que está complicado, COMO EN EL MOMENTO DEL VIDEO, hace estas cosas. Ahí se entendió ?

  • @whiplaash Sinceramente un match de 2 sets, en el cual Nadal gano los dos de corrido, el primero a un 7-6 y el segundo a un 6-1 me parece una victoria barrida... no se tu que opinas... por cierto, no veo necesario lo de "soquete"...

  • @max095 fijate como iba el partido cuando ocurrio el video, soquete

  • @jesusaranda89

    No im right. Because Berdych is challenging. You hear the umpire saying: Berdych is challenging the call on the right baseline, the ball was called out. Rafa wants to challenge but the ball was called out by Bernardes. So its Berdych challenge.

  • @VamosRafa04 You are actually wrong. You can see that before the umpire calls it out, Nadal challenges it by calling it out. Then, the umpire says "OUT" because NADAL called it out, and 1 second later the point is stopped. Therefore, If Nadal is wrong in the challenge, he also looses the point (regardless if he had hit that ball in afterwards or not...)

  • Hay algun video de Berdych mientras pasa todo esto???

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more