Fish Birth Amazes Evolutionists

Searching for Evolutionists Who will Defend Their Position (DEBATE DODGERS)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re6d-EvKkbA

Creation / Evolution Video Play Lists
http://hosted.homeserver.com/warneveryone/video_play_lists.htm
Job 12:8
Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee: and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee.

It was nice day on a tropical reef in what is now Western Australia when an armored fish began to give birth. Before she could finish, the violence of the Genesis Flood encased her in mud.

Of course, thats not how evolutionists interpret the evidence. Our mom-to-be is a member of a newly discovered species of placoderm, a family of now-extinct armored fish. Not only were these fish armored, their jaws could apparently crush bones. Evolutionists say that these fish lived between 354 and 417 million inflated evolutionary years ago. This discovery pushes back the first-known example of a fish giving live birth 200 million evolutionary years ago. After the discovery, scientists went back and studied the fossils of another placoderm and discovered that it, too, had a uterus with three apparent unborn pups in it. Scientists say that the partially born youngster was already a quarter of its mothers ten-inch length. This helped its survival in a fish-eat-fish world. Scientists admit that the fish had an unexpectedly sophisticated reproductive system. Such systems, they say, are found only in supposedly much more evolved fish.

Of course, like all other living things, the placoderms did not evolve but were created. Their so-called advanced reproductive system does not show evidence for evolutionary progression, but it does show evidence of a caring Creator.

Prayer: Lord, the entire creation declares the excellence of Your handiwork. Help me to do so, too. Amen.

References: http:www.livescience.com/animals/080528-fossil-embryo.html

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• articulated
• armoured
• fish
• Antiarchi
• Arthrodira
• Brindabellaspida
• Petalichthyida
• Phyllolepida
• Ptyctodontida
• Rhenanida
• Acanthothoraci
• Pseudopetalichthyida
• Stensioellida

[FatherChrismas]

Religion has no place in the study of natural history. It belongs in anthropology, and psychology. When it tries to compete with science, it just seems silly, and it makes its advocates seem mentally-challenged. The beauty of its poetry is ruined by its obsessive and inappropriate application outside of church. Intrusion of religious fantasy into public science-education runs counter to the survival necessities of a high-tech civilization in crisis, and practical tolerance wears thin.

[QuickScopeWeegee]

Right the church is right!!!!! like the Salem Witch triassl!!! those bitches doing black magic of course!!! -_-

[FrankLightheart]

@ptango666 I know! Just what is he saying? Is he trying to imply that "evolutionists" think years last longer than they actually do? Or that they think years are shorter?

He needs to make another video explaining how long evolutionists think a year is. Just for clarification.

[FrankLightheart]

Of course! The evidence proves that this species of fish went extinct when the great flood buried every last one of them in mud! It's so obvious that a caring creator lovingly crafted each of them before violently killing them in the blink of an eye!

On another note: what the hell is an "evolutionary year"? Just how long do evolutionists think a year lasts?

[Migue261]

religious people are hilarious

[Odysseus154]

Those blinded by pride cannot see the TRUTH of God's word. 2012, we will lead America back to the flock.

[eagleeye1975]

at 0:30 - please tell me how that's not a turtle?

[scorpiopede]

Okay, just because there were more 'advanced' fish so far back does NOT prove creationism, in fact, you're actually proving evolution. Evolution does mean 'the evolutionary advancement of a species'. If that was the case, how come coelocanths and worms are still alive while such advanced animals as dinosaurs (not birds, I'm referring to their relatives) or certain prehistoric mammals died off? And if it did prove creationism, how come there are no 400 million year old human remains?

[ptango666]

what are evolutionary years??

[MedicateOrHate]

This is what creates ignorant religious zealots...

[n2488]

ok and now show me the evidence for your Jewish zombie king theory and lets see which has a more scientific grounding