About this Event
20 Jul 2009
Assessing the Legal Guarantees on Lisbon: Background and Implications
Professors de Búrca and Laffan will speak at the IIEA on Monday, 20 July 2009 at 6 p.m.
About the speeches:
Professors de Búrca and Laffan will assess the legal guarantees, agreed on 19 June between the Heads of State and Government of the 27 EU Member States. This event will be chaired by Mr. Dick Roche TD, the Minister of State with responsibility for European Affairs, and co-hosted with the Irish Society for European Law.
This event will complement the IIEA's recent publication, Lisbon: The Irish Guarantees Explained, which is the definitive guide on the Irish guarantees and is essential reading for those interested in the Lisbon debate. It is available here.
If you would like to attend, please email reception@iiea.com as soon as possible. An ISEL/IIEA members' dinner will be served afterwards which is free of charge to members only. Registration for dinner is essential.
About the speakers:
Professor Gráinne de Búrca
Professor de Bùrca is a distinguished Irish legal academic and specialist in EU law. She is a current Professor of Law at Fordham Law School and has also co-authored the authoritative and definitive English language text on EU law, "EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials".
Professor Brigid Laffan
Professor Brigid Laffan is the Principal of the College of Human Sciences, University College Dublin. Professor Laffan was the founding director of the Dublin European Institute UCD in 1999 and is Chairperson of 'Ireland for Europe', an independent campaign to promote a 'Yes' vote in the second Lisbon referendum.
How do we reconcile the claim Europe will decrease cross border crime, with the fact that borders have ceased to exist?
CheeezMaster 1 year ago
@HullabalooSpatula It's a directors acount.
CheeezMaster 1 year ago
A student of Jean Monet for sure. A professor waxing lyrical about a supranational federal europe that make all our laws and puts into force the vaunted ideals of an intellectual elite and industrial and banking oligarchs. Her views are so deeply entrenched that she can't see past her scorn for all those who disagree with her enlightened view. We already voted NO. A yes vote is a vote against real democracy.
Believing a student of Monet is the same as trusting Brown, Merkle. Barrossa etc.
INFORMEDIRISH 2 years ago
Just thought I'd ask, all perfectly legal and above board I'm sure... but why is this video allowed to be over 51 minutes long when YouTube rules for everyone else allow only short videos of about 10 minutes?
Sort of a rhetorical question though, I don't really care that much.
HullabalooSpatula 2 years ago