JLF/Reese Institute climate change forum: Part 6 of 8

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
873 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 12, 2009

The John Locke Foundation and Lenoir-Rhyne University's Reese Institute for the Conservation of Natural Resources hosted A Forum on Climate Change: Opposing Views, Feb. 11. 2009, at the Hickory (N.C.) Metro Convention Center. Dr. William H. Schlesinger, president of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, and Dr. John R. Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, offered the opposing views. In this clip, Schlesinger concludes his response, and Christy delivers most of his response.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Notice what the activist Schlesinger chooses to point out. More pollen (meaning healthier plants) and more poison ivy (larger leaf plant life). How damn pathetic does their side have to get to try to work with emotions instead of logic. Yes, you dumbass. Even what you want to label as bad plants will do better in a higher carbon dioxide environment. That is why we invent weed control, you dimwitted bafoon.

  • Schlesinger is still operating on the assumption that we, with our puny contribution to CO2, are causing the increase. He's still operating on the assumption that CO2 is the problem. Did he even take the sun into consideration in his "study"?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more