THE FACT OF CREATION Introduction

When we examine the world of living beings, we encounter very amazing examples of "technology". On the body of a tiny insect or on the surface of a plant are mind-boggling systems designed with great precision. All of these show that there is a perfect "design" in living beings. It is impossible for this design to be the product of "chance" as Darwin's theory of evolution maintains. It is evident that these living beings are brought into being by a Creator Who has power over the entire nature.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Darwin's
• theory
• of
• evolution
• false

[Sardonac]

We observe natural selection

we observe mutation

we have fossil evidence

creationists: "Things are complex therefore they needed to be designed" Which is a fallacy.

[Sardonac]

"an incredibly and incomprehensibly complicated and wondrous machine"

Organisms are not incomprehensible. The study of them is called biology and it's a major field. By studying animals we've learned many things about them, including many flaws in species and mal-adaptations.

Evolution by natural selection is fact. If you can't see that you're either extremely ignorant or 7.

[Sardonac]

"a perfect creator doesn't HAVE TO create a perfect creation" - I never said it did.

"he can do whatever the f... he wants" - assuming a consciousness and desire, obvious personification.

"human beings are NOT meant to be immortal on earth." "i didn't mention at all what his intent" - these contradict.

[urbanguru]

no belief is more irrational than the belief of darwinists :)

[urbanguru]

if i am a perfect painter and i draw an ugly picture (although the design of life is far from ugly) for whatever reason, that doesn't mean that i can't draw a perfect picture. this is logic and i can't help you if you can't understand that. now what IS irrational is that someone can belive that a human being (an incredibly and incomprehensibly complicated and wondrous machine) came from a single cell by RANDOM mutations,which in turn came from more randomness and chance.. now THAT is irrational.

[urbanguru]

that's a silly argument, i'm not assuming one single thing you mentioned in your comment. the only thing i'm assuming here,on the basis of reason and logic, is that there must be a creator/designer who designed life. it's up to you if you want to call it god. i'm saying "he" because of the lack of a better word. i didn't mention at all what his intent was,nor did i say what his abilities are. i'm just saying that something that's perfect, logically,DOESN'T HAVE TO always create perfect creations

[Sardonac]

You assume so many things. a) god. b) gods intent. c) gods ability. d) gods gender.

Until you can prove all those things you're holding an irrational belief.

[urbanguru]

the only bs conclusion is yours. a perfect creator doesn't HAVE TO create a perfect creation... he can do whatever the f... he wants to do for whatever reason he chooses. human beings are NOT meant to be immortal on earth.

[Sardonac]

so a perfect creator only creats imperfect life? What a bs conclusion.

[tranhn]

bombardier beetle is amazing. To me it's ID