Re:What is taxed in the Code?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
718 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 9, 2006

The title says it all.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (DrGerbils)

  • He has disabled the comments of his video for obvious reasons because he doesn't want people like me telling the truth. Right Mr. Gerbils. I'm a lying troll? you ought to try looking in a mirror. Still waiting for the magical "liability" word.

  • Make up your mind. First "liable" was a magic word, then it wasn't, now it is again. You can't even keep your fantasies straight.

  • Now that you have confirmed that you are just a lying troll, any future comments by you, other than one informing me that you have started a thread on the tax protestor board at Quatloos so the issues can be discussed, will be deleted.

  • I see that you are not seriously interested in discusiing this topic. If you were, you would have done as I have suggested and moved it to a more appropriate forum.

  • I haved cited plenty of case law and supreme court decisions and code sections. I am still waiting for you to show a law that makes people liable for income tax. the four IRC sections you gave do not, I repeat do not create liability. The word liability must be used like in the 3 sec I cited for other types of taxes. Hello! what don't you understand.

  • The law does not depend on magic words. If you don't understand simple English, there really is no point in continuing.

see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DrGerbil is a communist fool.

    A true slave and lover of the income tax.

    A tax on labor is absolute slavery.

  • I Noticed that you mention specific cases where the defendants cited 861 and lost. but I was wondering what section caused attorney Tom Cryer

    of Louisiana to win his case? because I know that he did not cite 861. I think that his argument

    was more focused on the unconstitutionality of

    the tax code itself but I'm not sure.

  • I must agree with Mr. Gerbils, the 861 argument does NOT hold water. That said, not every American is liable to pay the federal income tax. The key is in the custom definitions listed in the code. Find the definitions for (Sec. 3121):

    Employee, Employer, United States, State, US Person, Wages.

    Also understand that because they give custom definitions of the words "includes" and "including" means that the common meaning ceases to exist under that area of the law.

  • That's the 16th. 13th abolished slavery.

  • doesn't the 13th amendment allow for income tax?

  • I did no know the word "liability" was magic word. I understand english just fine. I am not picking up what you are putting down.You need to have your head examined. Are you listening to what your saying, none of it makes any sense.

  • I see your not serious because you did not do what I suggested by providing a law that makes anyone liable for income tax to back up all your goobly goob.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more