i7-2600 on After Effect
Top Comments
All Comments (101)
-
Even if it's older, the point is that you get more performance/price when you build a PC
-
OFC the i7 will be better than a 2year old Xeon (especially if you're only using one) and it's a cheaper solution. You're also comparing the OSs and all kinds of shit.
The solution really is a Hackintosh as you get the performance, price and Mac OSX!
-
@fnnr1stefan This guy has no really specs to validate anything realistic, just a video not showing much of anything. I know.. I'll record a video of a cat and dog and say a turtle is quicker then both and add blur effects to the video and include a chart that compare heart rate and life expectancy to prove absolutely nothing..
-
i7 really, why not compare a i7 Mac Pro like PC Magazine had?
That's like comparing Pentium 4 to a Core duo or Core 2 duo.. lol.. Try again!
-
Oh for fuck's sake. Stop the Mac vs PC debate. There are more important things going on in this world. A computer is a computer.
-
@SPAZZY1912 I know, I said that in my comment..
-
it is a mac pro and they use xeon processors, the imacs use the i7 or i5
I don't care. I can get a Mac for about £4 at Mcdonalds.
Zlyzer 5 months ago 33
This is not really a Mac vs PC debate. But I see why people would confuse it with that.. It's more of a CPU debate really. Xeon's are old "server" CPU's whereas the i7 2600 are fairly new CPU's. The description is very wrong. It should be i7-2600 vs Xeon, Not vs Mac Pro..
They have i7 CPU's in the new iMacs, so you would be better of testing this with an i7 quad core iMac than a Mac Pro Quad Xeon.
monej 3 months ago 4