Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

UBC Lecture Dawkins Delusion Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,286
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 4, 2008

Part one of the Dawkin's Delusion lecture and Q/A session delivered by Dr. William Lane Craig that coincided with the 2007 "Does God Exist?" debate at UBC.

  • likes, 54 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "Surely Dawkins has heard Craig's response to his central argument? If Dawkins is so sure of himself, why doesnt he debate Craig and prove him wrong?"

    1. What reason is there to think Dawkins has heard Craig's response? I doubt hesits around watching YouTube or follows each and every screed written against him by religious apologists.

    2. Plenty of other inviduals have pointed out the flaws in Craig's response - not the least of which, he completely mischaracterizes Dawkins argument.

  • this man is absolute trash why are ubc students exposed to this crap

see all

All Comments (110)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Craig should try and take down Hume, a proper atheist!!!!

  • its known that 75% of the 1000's of professionals in the Life Sciences , Astronomy, Physics realm across the highest ranking world University network , do not believe in a Creator or a personal God & Savior . These are some of the brightest minds on the planet but the reason they do not get involved with arguing with this boring junior level Christian apologist , is they have real work to do in their respective fields .

  • @JonathanHassall You should debate Dr Craig. You would win for sure. You're so smart, the Craigman wouldn't be able to stand up to your wit and excellent assessment of the situation. Amazing that you haven't been invited to debate him. I know Dr Craig is afraid of you. He's such a coward.

  • @citizenghosttown You're kidding, right?  Even his fellow "atheists" are calling Dawkins out.

  • after 7:30 dr craig fails badly. why to use examples if u can just debate the POINT made by Dawkins???

  • Dawkin's biggest mistake was actually acknowledging theism as a reasonable argument or position to hold. He effectively tries to disprove something which has never been proven, instead of playing the "burden of proof" card, he is immediately on the offensive. Also, it annoys me when people confuse "philsophers" with good "debaters". Dr. Craig is nothing more than the Pardoner in Chaucer's work, using rhetoric to dance around truth and reason. His Philosophy is terrible.

  • @Battery9876 lol...great point...NOT!

  • Of course, since you are religious you hate free-speech. Damn comment filters.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more