Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Corporate Controlled Elections

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
16,019
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 2, 2008

2008 Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader discusses the corporate controlled elections. This is in response to a question asked by a student at the University of West Virginia, September 24, 2008. Video by Karen Kilroy - http://karenkilroy.com

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • An all out attack on the main stream media MUST take place. The people MUST be educated beyond the corporate mouthpiece!

    Take back the AIRWAVES. Destroy the NETWORK MEDIA. Thier control of the information reaching the people IS CRIMINAL ! ! ! !

    PROSECUTE THEM: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX...

    THEY ARE VIOLATING THE FIRST AMMENDMENT BY INCITING THE PEOPLE TO VIOLENTLY OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA !

    Think NOT? I'm ready to riot...what about you?

  • 5 Stars. Nader has managed to secure my vote again this year. The political climate is right for a Nader presidency if we can agitate and come together. Vote Nader/Gonzales '08. Spread the word..

see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You're right

  • Well Said! Totally Correct!

  • If Ralph Nader ever made it to the office of President he'd be assassinated by the right wingers. He's speaks for the people and has policies that people hold dear, and he gets dumped on. I don't get it. Democrats are just as bought out as the Republicans are.

  • i would love to have ralph nader in office as our president but once he gets in office they will cast him as the bad guy and harass him in the media. the media will blame everything on him just like they did with the 2000 election. We as americans need to vote in local, state, federal and national election NONE OF THE ABOVE, that will force the system to change and we will have all the power by stating our views in washington and voting more independents with good ideas.

  • I feel Nader is too honest & too straight of an arrow to be President. It is not that he can;t or he is not capable....He's just a bit more honest than those that go corrupt to get into office. No man was ever whom he said to be whom gained public office as president...they've all failed in at least a few ways....You'll never get an honest man in as the leader of the "free{?}" world. Least not the ways things have gone OR seem to be going.

  • At 99.999999999999999999999999999­999 maybe we'll start getting upset, but what the hell are we going to do about it then?

  • I agree, marking something as spam just because you disagree with it is a form of censorship, albeit on just about the smallest scale there is. They probably did it because they're tired of hearing the same old line all the time about Nader being a "spoiler" candidate. A thumbs-down would do the trick.

    I do think the third party movement needs to work harder to get lesser-of-two-evils voters involved, knowing that they want to vote strategically, like drawing more attention to local elections

  • Everyone, I am a diehard Ralph Nader fan, but please stop marking opinions you don't like as spam! I thought we wanted a better world, not the same old garbage. Sorry, SpookyVid, that you were erroneously marked. Also sorry you blame Ralph Nader when you seem to misunderstand him; and it's you that have betrayed him, not the other way around; not his fault he didn't win. Thank you for your civic service, it's a shame you now see your honorable work and experience with true democracy as wasted.

  • The masses know the saying, If everyone is jumping off the bridge do you jump, too?

    What do I see? The masses jumping off the bridge in droves for the dem/rep party.

    That is gonna be one full river.

    I could walk off the bridge after everyone gets done voting this November.

    I love my country but dang, this gonna be one of the longest 4 years we will have to grin and bear through.

  • If we live in a democracy, it is frightening to see the majority vote for dem/rep party that is bought and paid for by the top 1% by campaign money.

    They get an $800 billion bail out in 2 months by the dem/rep party.

    After this November election who knows how much the top 1% will become. 1% ending up holding 99%?

    It isn't by chance. Whoops, 95% of the countries wealth just hops on over to the 1%.

    Don't vote for the 1%. It takes a majority to do it.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more