"Outrage" Documentary Outs Anti Gay Politicians Who Are Gay

"Outrage" is a "searing indictment of the hypocrisy of closeted politicians with appalling gay rights voting records who actively campaign against the LGBT community they covertly belong to."

"Outrage," a new documentary from filmmaker Kirby Dick, takes issue with the secret lives of closeted gay politicians -- especially conservative Republicans who outwardly oppose gay rights.

The film, which premiered in April 2009 at the Tribeca Film Festival, features tell-alls from men who say they've had relationships with various Republicans, including Florida Governor Charlie Crist, Bush strategist Ken Mehlman and former Senator Larry Craig.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/28/outrage-documentary-activ_n_192476.html

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• gay
• outing
• Outrage
• documentary
• lgbt
• politicians
• Florida
• Governor
• Charlie
• Crist
• homosexuality
• homosexual

[BlackRepublican2010]

f sexual orientation is a right, than polygamy, beastiality & pedophilia are rights. Ridiculous argument.

Skin color is an inherent characteristic whereas sexuality is not Therefore an analogy of gay marriage to interracial marriage is a rather poor one.

Why not legalize grown men marrying underage girls? Why not? They love each other. Are you a pedophile-a-phobe? There has to be a moral standard & the most healthy natural human relationship is one man & one woman.

[CivilizedJerk]

@BlackRepublican2010 Teen age girls under 18 aren't adults who can make mature adult decisions in most states. That's why the law says it's illegal, cause they can't make decisions on there own, even if they want to get married. Not the same for two same sex adults who have the maturity to make grown up decisions. Try another angle cause you fail at this one.

[WhiteFlowerLei76]

Outrage is an excellent documentary, one of the best Ive seen this year.

[IHVHandmind]

@Siferatu - Homosexuality is different from pedophilia and bestiality because the premise of consent is stronger.

[GodCreatesGays2]

@Siferatu, you asked if we should "protect" the rights of sexual abusers, like those who want to rape children and assault animals. I explained why we should not: because they abuse and hurt others who are in no position to consent or defend themselves against such unwanted abuse. Such a situation simply has no correlation to consensual, adult relationships, which SHOULD be protected, because they are mutually-beneficial to those involved. There's a difference between love and rape. Understand?.

[Siferatu]

@GodCreatesGays2 But I wasn't talking about the partners was I? I'm talking about the attraction of the individual, the primal urge that says this is who they are sexually.

[GodCreatesGays2]

@Siferatu, homosexuality concerns adults in a consensual, mutually-beneficial relationship, just like heterosexuality. Pedophilia is the sexual abuse of children, who can't give adult consent & who are harmed by the abuse. Similarly, animals can't give informed consent, so bestiality falls outside the realm of "consenting partner" relationships. Raping children or animals can't be correlated to any loving adult relationships, str8 or gay. If you are still confused about anything, let me know.

[Siferatu]

@GodCreatesGays2 If sexual orientation is innate, why not protect pedophilia and bestiality? It's not their choice to be attracted, they were born that way.

[GodCreatesGays2]

@BlackRepublican2010 babbles, "polygamy, beastiality & pedophilia are rights. Ridiculous argument."

Yes, your argument is ridiculous. Insane, even. Too bad you embarrassed yourself making it.

"Skin color is an inherent characteristic whereas sexuality is not Therefore an analogy of gay marriage to interracial marriage is a rather poor one."

Educated people know that both skin color & sexual orientation are innate, so a comparison between the two is quite apt.

Think before you write please.

[DogsneedpIeasuretoo]

@13igdawg

Children are different from animals, we use animals all the time to our advantage, we even kill and eat animals, we don't do that to children. There are different rules for what you can and can not do with animals, different rules than the ones you follow with human children.

My argument is not retarded, what is retarded is that you are using human rules on non-humans. Or you seriously believe an animal is a human? Would you accuse people working on a slaughter house of mass genocide?

[13igdawg]

@DogsneedpIeasuretoo yep.. just like they consent to get in cars and drive off w/ strangers for "candy"... Children don't know better, neither do animals... your argument is fucking retarded