CBS Evening News September 15, 2001 .... The providential passport was issued to Satam al-Suqami in Saudi Arabia in August of 1998 (Same time Clinton writes Bin Laden into the global terror script, coincidentally). Three years later, a stranger handed Suqami's passport to an NYPD detective on the streets of Manhattan — just moments after American Airlines Flight 11 attempted an unscheduled landing on the 93rd floor of WTC1. How did this passport — a piece of paper soaked in jet fuel — survive the explosive landing?
According to the 9-11 Commission, Suqami uses his magic passport to board Flight 11. He then shoots or stabs Daniel Lewin, a former member of an elite Israeli special-operations unit, before moving into the cabin to get set for Mohamed Atta's attempted landing on the 93rd floor.
While the ensuing conflagration destroys the plane's indestructible black boxes, Suqami's magic passport flies out of his pocket, or luggage, passes through the building, and lands on a sidewalk, barely singed and completely intact.
Hijacker's Passport and a Landing Gear Fragment Alone Survive Fiery Crash
This illustration from Chapter 1 of FEMA's report shows what few pieces of aircraft debris passed entirely through the Towers. A charred fragment of landing gear on the intersection of West and Rector streets was the only piece they traced to Flight 11.
According to ABC News and the Associated Press, the passport of hijacker Satam Al Suqami was found a few blocks from the WTC. The Guardian was skeptical: "the idea that Atta's passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged [tests] the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism." Note the passport did not belong to Atta, as is commonly claimed.
Satam Al Suqami was supposedly on Flight 11, the plane that supposedly hit the North Tower. In that collision, the building's core would have absorbed almost the entire airplane, which hit the northeast wall nearly dead center.
It is known that some debris from the aircraft travelled completely through the structure. For example, life jackets and portions of seats from the aircraft were found on the roof of the Bankers Trust building, located to the south of WTC2. Part of the landing gear from this aircraft was found at the corner of West and Rector streets, some five blocks south of the WTC complex. (FEMA Report)
On September 11 2002, one year Anniversary of the death of our son, we were informed that the Recovery team at Ground Zero have found the ATM Bank card of Waleed [Iskandar, passenger on Flight 11] and that it will be mailed to us in Northridge. When we received it, we found it in good condition. A Waleed on Flight 111 that was not a hijacker? Why do most of the Flight 11 Hijackers names resemble Walid M Sheri or a surname of it?
How could a plastic card survive the fire of the terrorist attack of the Black Tuesday on the USA?
I consider it as a sign from Waleed to his parents on the first Anniversary of his loss.
http://www.iskandar.com/waleed911/atmcard.html
If a detective is any good, he will take a look at whether the evidence was planted or real. While he won't accept the defendant's word at face value, he will discard any evidence which was obviously planted. If he determines that evidence is planted, he will ask the follow up questions of who planted the evidence and why. His investigative instincts and street smarts will also lead him to ask whether the person who planted the evidence was the real criminal -- because the real perpetrator of the crime often has the biggest motivation to frame someone else.
a passport from one of the alleged hijackers was "found" a couple of blocks from the Twin Towers. And yet the government claims that the areas inside the Twin Towers where planes crashed were infernos so hot that they caused the collapse of the massive steel cores in the center of the towers. Indeed, the passport-owner's hijacked plane was allegedly almost completely lodged in the building's core. How could the passport have survived and ended up a couple of blocks away?
It is thus clear that evidence was planted to frame the hijackers on 9/11. Even a simple tv detective would ask who had the opportunity and motive to frame these patsies. He would also ask whether the persons who planted the evidence were the real culprits.
@SuperJV4x the question I ask is what would a conspirator have by purposely planting sloppy evidence? Unless... It wasn't a conspirator but a whistleblower trying to get the public's attention?
WallyChapman 3 months ago
@WallyChapman A twofold effect. In local context, at the scene there was a very concerted effort to keep the public, volunteers, media, and crowds away for the first week. On September 12 and 13th it was unstable buildings, that really were stable. On September 14th they told all volunteers to go home, no help needed. It rained that day. On the 15th they found the passport blocks away which made the surrounding area also the crime scene. No public allowed near the crime scene.
IranContraScumDid911 3 months ago