Re: Evolution Wants to Make a Monkey Out of You part 2

More classic VenomfangX madness. I admire the effort he puts into his intros mind, it's just a shame his vids nosedive so quickly once his mush appears in front of the camera

for a rebuttal of the first part see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9sT5YZyRNA


...and a link here for spymaster:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/origins/bigbang/index.shtml

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Holy
• Bible
• Scripture
• Jesus
• Christ
• Lord
• God
• Messiah
• Proof
• Proving
• Evolution
• Universe
• Creation
• Salvation
• Gos

[Kawaiibat]

@goodgrl86

I have no idea where you get that the Big Bang is part of Evolution. It's part of a meta-physic's theory on the creation of the universe. Evolution has to deal with the descent by modification of living organisms in nature. Not to deal with the creation of matter.... at all. But matter's and consequential effect on organisms development.

[TheRealEricLester]

that means nothing (note that thunderfoot doesnt sensor comments)

[kp295swiss]

haha i sent him a super long letter about how every sentence was practically wrong

[modevotion1]

yes!

that twat said so much contradicting nonsense i got dizzy and had to lie down.

[Aman1212]

Thank you for showing what is real.

[kurdore2]

Ok just want to make clear

venom fangx's 5 parts disapproving is 80% disapproving the theory and 20% other theories of bigbang and proving the bible's explanation to geological phonomenons!!! noel you are saying that it has nothing to do with it, but disapproving big bang and such is just an addition to venom's disapproval, and I think venom does sound intellectual and for everything he gets biblical reference spot on... and just to say there are more people supporting venom than thunderfoot

[mollen19]

why does venomfool even jump to big bang wich has nothing to do with darwin and evolution and are far more philosophical than scientific

[spymaster2]

I remember EXACTLY what I said, and I said it three months ago. You read it YESTERDAY and still don't get it. I never once said that the Big Bang theory is invalid. FOLLOW THE CONVERSATION! I don't have to time to come back here 3 months later and explain this all AGAIN to someone who is unwilling (or unable) to understand what I wrote the first time around. Atheist troll.

[spymaster2]

No, obviously you can't follow the conversation. Allow me to quote myself in it's entirety...

"I find the Big Bang to be a plausible explanation for the existence of the universe. I find the idea that there was no void for it to expand into to be completely stupid."

I went into this all already. Why it's stupid. Why I accept the Big Bang theory as the start of the universe, but not the later cosmology that has been added to it, etc.

[dominickearney]

You said it invalidates the Big Bang thoery? You did. Allow me to quote you: "I find the idea that there was no void for it to expand into to be completely stupid."

Why is this stupid? It is only "stupid" if you apply the human perception of 3-dimensional space. If you can't even remember what you said in your arguements, then I suggest YOU stay out of it!