Obama/Clinton Gay Rights Debate, Analyzed

1. You are not born gay.
2. You do not choose to be gay.
3. The military probably should make special rules and provisions for homosexual soldiers.
4. Homosexuality can be changed in a person, that doesn't mean it SHOULD be.

More details on each point in the video. I've been meaning to make this one for awhile, especially since I've become much better at editing footage. I think there are a number of issues surrounding gay rights in America that are quite confused, on both sides of the issue and they were on display in this debate.

My goal here is just to do my part to clear up some of those issues in my own small way. I will do my best to answer questions if or when they come up in the comments.

(BTW, I apologize for the typo when writing "institutionalized," I didn't mention that the gay gene is both unproven AND illogical, since natural selection would thoroughly remove anything like that, and I should add that homosexuality is not perversion because perversion takes pleasure in harmful things, when there's nothing innately harmful about homosexual interest or sexual relations)

Thanks to mattwcreates, EqualityTube, reverendmalibu, biskit27 and SpeiVecordia for uploading the original footage.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• barack
• obama
• hillary
• clinton
• bill
• richardson
• homosexuality
• gay
• rights
• logo
• etheridge
• debate
• analyzed
• gene
• visible
• vote

[JBrantleyMusic]

So your arguing that all sexual activity (whether gay or straight) is something that we are conditioned to engage in and sexual orientation is not genetic?

[EGarrett01]

@JBrantleyMusic

I think it's similar to our preference in foods. We naturally eat, just like we naturally have sex. But some people come to prefer certain foods and others like other foods, usually due to other circumstances...not choice but conditioning...sexual orientation seems to be the same way. And just like you have the right to like any food you want, you have the right to like any type of sex with consenting adults.

[houseofbenjamin1]

Wait, are people whether discussing being gay is a choice? (shakes head in disbelief)

could everyone please send me the date and time THEY chose THEIR sexuality please.

[EGarrett01]

@houseofbenjamin1

No, but I'm arguing that it's neither chosen not genetic. There's a third option that makes much more sense and plugs the logical holes in both theories. Please watch the video.

[lightandbeautiful]

Homosexual activists know the importance of words.

Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".

The word "gay" has helped homosexual activists push their dishonest agenda on unsuspecting people.

The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationsh­ip being discussed.

[killerboyfoolz]

@EGarrett01 I agree that it's not a choice nor genetic. However, there are scientific evidences and case-studies showing us how hormones is the reason why we are what we are.

So...from your logic, you can derive this research to your own conclusion. =)

[FreekinEkin2]

Evidence shows that even those in jail are not stimulated by images of the same sex (unless they were gay anyway), they choose to act upon sexual urges that are not gender specific.

[Darkknight96082]

I think this video is an attack on politicians more so then gay rights

[IggyHazard]

0:29 "Rights conferred by the state." That right there is a misnomer since the state only abolishes rights rather than granting them. The state only permits or inhibits (and does so in favor of order, oppression, and control). It doesn't confer rights.

Hitlery hates everyday joes because he's an elitist oppressor that wants to oppress everybody with oppression.

[L8Rdudesanddudettes]

i find it annoying when people say "gaysandlesbians" really fast like they're afraid to say it or like its simething dirty.

[tsumui]

@EGarrett01 First, who says there's no range of variation in homosexuality? Are you saying bisexuals don't exist? Second, maybe you're right that a genetic difference will give bigots something to which they can cling, but that doesn't make the claim untrue. Finally, don't just simply assert the the claim is illogical. If you disagree, read the study I messaged you and tell me where the investigators went wrong. I'd love to hear a review of their work.