9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (10,824)
-
"Harrit was wrong."
Of course he was. Millette is just another one who rebuts those frauds. Funny thing, even Harrit is back paddling.
And one must think, something as advanced as Nanothermite, praised as highly effective explosive, should not be hard to prove. Especially when a 100t or more of it was used. ;D
Well, the dust has been examined several times, still no explosives found. It should be obvious now... but... twoofers will still insist it were controlled demolitions.
-
@h87gj Good find, i've been reading a forrum on this and it is very true, thanks for posting it, truthers still will not submit to it thow, they will never change their minds no matter what evidence is produced.
-
@h87gj from memory when i read the Harrit paper they said the composition was slightly different to standard thermite but that it was still flammable and the composition was still explosive and incendiary. Thermite after all is a mix of chemicals so different ratios of substances, and even extra substances added to it can make it react differently to an igniting agent.
-
@h87gj all i did was ask you for the link to the study so i could read it lol...relax bro. just post a link here for me and others to read or send me a message...geez relax lol
-
To be honest, I don't care what every single truther believes, since the pool of 9/11 beliefs to choose from seems to be inexhaustible.
I posted the information for anyone willing to read the study with an open mind, which you clearly haven't done, otherwise you knew why those chips are not thermite. Thanks for the impressive demonstration of nine-elevenist ignorance once again.
The point is, the chips DONT have the composition of thermite, they never had. Harrit was wrong.
user ThePeage is: either a bored person with too much time on their hands, a loonatic who thinks he has to spam a video with 50 responses, or a CIA or other intelligence agency misinformer. This video is very well developed, so it is no wonder that it is drowned out by people attempting to refute the real world scientific evidence presented here. I do not agree with deleting comments most of the time, but when there is this amount of spamming i think some house cleaning is required.
tomiratz 1 day ago 5
@jimhemstreet
Sorry, you are wrong. No thermite has been found in the dust.
Independent testing (you all waited years for this to happen, right?) of the "red-grey chips" in the dust, done by Dr. Jim Millette, found them not to have any thermitic qualities. Looks bad for the twoofer scientists.
Google "WTC Dust Study Feb 29, 2012 by Dr. James Millette".
h87gj 1 day ago 4