9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

What's wrong with mainstream experts?

• Category

  Science & Technology

[Ryan Webb]

Nano-thermate/thermite found, eyewitness testimony of veteran firefighter and police officers, 3 buildings in one day all broke the laws of nature, Bin Laden denied the attack and referenced that only a government could pull off an attack like 9/11 not the Taliban half way across the world. There's a lot more EVIDENCE to find and to prove and as an Airborne Combat Medic Who's tour of Duty was from 2006-2007 in Baghdad I don't like the the look of the EVIDENCE but I am searching for the Truth.

[Dan Trance]

Thank you. Nice video, very well done. Funny thing is that only the US still thinks that 911 was done by some cave men with knives. the rest of the world knows it was an inside job. please open your eyes :)

[TheFiveeagles]

thanks for allowing comments. I see the other folks debunking the conspiracy theorist have disabled their comet sections.LOL

[userdenied58]

Nowhere did I say it was impossible ~ I said it was illogical.. Nor am I claiming a pure technical problem ~ emplacement is mechanical. Again where is the evidence of a work crew because the amount of debris removed to install these devices would have been extensive.

Nor did I claim you manufactured evidence ~ Truthers do.

All of this because someone made up a finding of what "may be" thermite plastic residue and a picture of an angular cut beam (which was found to be cut by a welder's torch).

[Favel22]

I am not manufacturing evidence but explaining a technical possibility. You claim it is just impossible to put charges on a building for a number of technical reasons which turn out not to be technical. Does not mean they went that way but they could have while you just claim it is impossible. Because people would notice or a specific 160 letter code would be sent by sitting on a phone...

[Favel22]

Not true. Codes are not dialed by accident. I might as well write the great american novel by having a cat sleep on my keyboard.

You keep making assumptions about the crews. Noticed by whom? The local banksters on the WTC? The colombian janitors? And why would anyone take video of it? How would you find those work orders, at the "global historical work order library"?

BTW, i am not in any way offering evidence here but answering your questions about the technical feasibility of it.

[userdenied58]

No Favel, years of experience and sound reasoning.

Any coded sequence may be accidentally dialed by someone sitting on their phone.

A work crew is going to be noticed and accounted ~ nowhere do these orders for any structural work exist. Video for large quantities or removed fire retardant would be available. Where was it dumped? How many people knew?

Yes, theories work backwards, but they don't manufacture evidence if they are valid.

[Favel22]

This smell test of yours is your own invention. You are pulling insane technical issues out of a hat. None of the reasons you mention are technical. Its just that they sound complicated, impractical, would take too long, etc. And seriously, pocket dials? WTF?

Its not just about calling but sending codes, sequences. Cant be done by accident. And the emplacement can be done by crews working for weeks.

Every theory about an event starts from it and goes backward. What exactly is your point?

[userdenied58]

Robot and pocket dials occur frequently. How large an event window will be is proportional to the operation. We are talking about bringing down the WTC buildings. Even with a limited window you still have the emplacement problem.

Finally, all these theories are taking an event and working backwards. This guy designed this device after 9/11 to support a conspiracy which would have taken work crews spraying explosives and attaching detonators on multiple floors.

Doesn't pass the smell test.

[Favel22]

Oh, a little more about the timers/cellphones.

Cellphones DO NOT go off randomly but yes, people sometimes dial the wrong number. You can minimize those risks with a well designed digital circuit. Programmed to only work within a given time frame (say a 4 hour window), and if a particular code is sent to the receiver. That cannot happen by accident even if someone dials the number.