9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
3,595
Subscription preferences
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
311,115
4,095
302
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like physicsandreason's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike physicsandreason's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add physicsandreason's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Nov 10, 2010
What's wrong with mainstream experts?
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
10:13
Why they needed 9/11: Oil, Money, and Geopoliticsby AlienScientistFeatured
202,849
-
2:56
Why Towers Did not Collapse (PROOF)by fndg762
120,527 views
-
5:14
9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show Youby 1Trainwreck
2,759,893 views
-
2:01
the missile that hit the pentagon came from underneath the helicopterpadby rocky head
677,590 views
-
6:53
Make Thermite out of Sandby mrhomescientist
1,400,163 views
-
0:38
What and who the hell is that?by sertora
3,372,249 views
-
9:45
9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steelby physicsandreason
75,122 views
-
5:16
General of all American Intelligence: 911 was a fraud!by sugarpuddin88
392,847 views
-
3:30
Physicist Challenges the Official 911 Storyby sdlhsn
217,068 views
-
159
videos
Play all
9-11by TPPATRIOT -
3:58
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explainedby RKOwens4
370,017 views
-
9:59
Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effectby Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
10,338 views
-
3:51
9/11 Debunked: 95% of United 93 foundby RKOwens4
321,848 views
-
43:20
Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura: 9/11: The Pentagon [Season 2, Episode 8] (Full Length • HD)by Justin Wallis
370,462 views
-
33:49
'9/11 was an inside job': Full speech by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at UNby RussiaToday
889,598 views
-
3:49
Railroad thermite weldingby Wolfgang Lendner
2,470,821 views
-
5:37
Mythbusters Toast 1/2 Ton of Thermiteby Crashdance22
1,094,663 views
-
2:02
Debunking Novas Pancake Theory of WTC using common senseby clbackus
99,182 views
-
9:38
Experiments with nanothermiteby DK1Ryan
17,778 views
-
8:10
Geraldo Rivera Does 911 Truth Segment About Building 7by SaveOurSovereignty3
136,163 views
-
5:06
9/11 Hijackers ALIVE!by thetruthwillout
204,048 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Video Responses
All Comments (12,475)
Ryan Webb 1 day ago
Nano-thermate/thermite found, eyewitness testimony of veteran firefighter and police officers, 3 buildings in one day all broke the laws of nature, Bin Laden denied the attack and referenced that only a government could pull off an attack like 9/11 not the Taliban half way across the world. There's a lot more EVIDENCE to find and to prove and as an Airborne Combat Medic Who's tour of Duty was from 2006-2007 in Baghdad I don't like the the look of the EVIDENCE but I am searching for the Truth.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Dan Trance 2 days ago
Thank you. Nice video, very well done. Funny thing is that only the US still thinks that 911 was done by some cave men with knives. the rest of the world knows it was an inside job. please open your eyes :)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
TheFiveeagles 3 days ago
thanks for allowing comments. I see the other folks debunking the conspiracy theorist have disabled their comet sections.LOL
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
userdenied58 3 days ago
Nowhere did I say it was impossible ~ I said it was illogical.. Nor am I claiming a pure technical problem ~ emplacement is mechanical. Again where is the evidence of a work crew because the amount of debris removed to install these devices would have been extensive.
Nor did I claim you manufactured evidence ~ Truthers do.
All of this because someone made up a finding of what "may be" thermite plastic residue and a picture of an angular cut beam (which was found to be cut by a welder's torch).
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Favel22 4 days ago
I am not manufacturing evidence but explaining a technical possibility. You claim it is just impossible to put charges on a building for a number of technical reasons which turn out not to be technical. Does not mean they went that way but they could have while you just claim it is impossible. Because people would notice or a specific 160 letter code would be sent by sitting on a phone...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Favel22 4 days ago
Not true. Codes are not dialed by accident. I might as well write the great american novel by having a cat sleep on my keyboard.
You keep making assumptions about the crews. Noticed by whom? The local banksters on the WTC? The colombian janitors? And why would anyone take video of it? How would you find those work orders, at the "global historical work order library"?
BTW, i am not in any way offering evidence here but answering your questions about the technical feasibility of it.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
userdenied58 4 days ago
No Favel, years of experience and sound reasoning.
Any coded sequence may be accidentally dialed by someone sitting on their phone.
A work crew is going to be noticed and accounted ~ nowhere do these orders for any structural work exist. Video for large quantities or removed fire retardant would be available. Where was it dumped? How many people knew?
Yes, theories work backwards, but they don't manufacture evidence if they are valid.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Favel22 5 days ago
This smell test of yours is your own invention. You are pulling insane technical issues out of a hat. None of the reasons you mention are technical. Its just that they sound complicated, impractical, would take too long, etc. And seriously, pocket dials? WTF?
Its not just about calling but sending codes, sequences. Cant be done by accident. And the emplacement can be done by crews working for weeks.
Every theory about an event starts from it and goes backward. What exactly is your point?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
userdenied58 5 days ago
Robot and pocket dials occur frequently. How large an event window will be is proportional to the operation. We are talking about bringing down the WTC buildings. Even with a limited window you still have the emplacement problem.
Finally, all these theories are taking an event and working backwards. This guy designed this device after 9/11 to support a conspiracy which would have taken work crews spraying explosives and attaching detonators on multiple floors.
Doesn't pass the smell test.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Favel22 5 days ago
Oh, a little more about the timers/cellphones.
Cellphones DO NOT go off randomly but yes, people sometimes dial the wrong number. You can minimize those risks with a well designed digital circuit. Programmed to only work within a given time frame (say a 4 hour window), and if a particular code is sent to the receiver. That cannot happen by accident even if someone dials the number.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube