This groundbreaking NRDC documentary explores the startling phenomenon of ocean acidification, which may soon challenge marine life on a scale not seen for tens of millions of years. The film, feat...
This groundbreaking NRDC documentary explores the startling phenomenon of ocean acidification, which may soon challenge marine life on a scale not seen for tens of millions of years. The film, featuring Sigourney Weaver, originally aired on Discovery Planet Green.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Im sorry you cannot tolerate opposing views and have to debase yourself by throwing "troll" around (incorrectly BTW). Interesting that your responses have now turned ad hominem because you don't have a rational rebuttal.
The article I referenced had more peer review studies than your site. So I guess universities and scientific journals are no longer credible? well at least the ones that dont fit your world view? Glad we have you to get us the truth otherwise how would we know what is credible?
Source... google SPPI Acid Test. I know wiki isn't credible... there is plenty of geological evidence for more CO2 than today.
Anything can be poisonous in large quantities. You deliberately removed context. It would take 2500 years to reach levels OSHA considers hazardous according to that uigi site.
The point is increased CO2 may not be the cause of the recent decreased pH (in enough amount) and a major coming disaster like the video infers.
You debate by NOT having an all or nothing approach. Just because we cant fly to mars doesn't mean we shouldn't try for the moon. Over-pop may bring the end of all species but does that mean we shouldnt try to do what we can in the meantime? How would we fix over-pop?
The variables of (a), (b) and (c) in this instance do not matter as they are all operating within the parameters of "P" = "political economic pyramid model.
(a-b-c) = P
P = Z
This is the problem, no one has built a complete model of the existing, everyone is working in their own little project. Time to call a ceasefire and collate ALL the data. The UN is trying, and as much as you do not like that, somebody has to.
Over-pop and the political model are defiantly a problem in current conditions. There are also cultural influences that maintain the system. I would like to be optimistic and say changes could be made, but I dont see any possible way to bring about changes; do you?
I do not have a problem with the UN compiling data? The summary and inference that all 2500 contributors endorse the summary is what I have problems with, 'cause they dont. Many of the contributors are political figures.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Here's the NRDC web site and the peer-reviewed research that supports this video:
nrdc. org/oceans/acidification/scien ce.asp
The article I referenced had more peer review studies than your site. So I guess universities and scientific journals are no longer credible? well at least the ones that dont fit your world view? Glad we have you to get us the truth otherwise how would we know what is credible?
"Jurassic period ... 7X the CO2 as today"
WIkipedia is not a credible source. Even if your information is correct, what's your point?
"trivial 1% change"
Source?
I know wiki isn't credible... there is plenty of geological evidence for more CO2 than today.
Anything can be poisonous in large quantities. You deliberately removed context. It would take 2500 years to reach levels OSHA considers hazardous according to that uigi site.
The point is increased CO2 may not be the cause of the recent decreased pH (in enough amount) and a major coming disaster like the video infers.
Not necessarily:
uigi. com/MSDS_gaseous_CO2.html
Furthermore, doubling the amount in the atmosphere would trigger catastrophic climate changes.
How can you have a debate about the environment without population being addressed?
(a-b-c) = P
P = Z
This is the problem, no one has built a complete model of the existing, everyone is working in their own little project. Time to call a ceasefire and collate ALL the data. The UN is trying, and as much as you do not like that, somebody has to.
cont...
I do not have a problem with the UN compiling data? The summary and inference that all 2500 contributors endorse the summary is what I have problems with, 'cause they dont. Many of the contributors are political figures.