1,066,442 views
Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Watch this video in a new window
Acid Test: The Global Challenge of Ocean Acidification
This groundbreaking NRDC documentary explores the startling phenomenon of ocean acidification, which may soon challenge marine life on a scale not seen for tens of millions of years. The film, feat...
Series
(10)
|
More From Channel
|
Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
165 ratings
Sign in to rate
33,898 views
© 2010 YouTube, LLC
Here's the NRDC web site and the peer-reviewed research that supports this video:
nrdc. org/oceans/acidification/scien ce.asp
The article I referenced had more peer review studies than your site. So I guess universities and scientific journals are no longer credible? well at least the ones that dont fit your world view? Glad we have you to get us the truth otherwise how would we know what is credible?
"Jurassic period ... 7X the CO2 as today"
WIkipedia is not a credible source. Even if your information is correct, what's your point?
"trivial 1% change"
Source?
I know wiki isn't credible... there is plenty of geological evidence for more CO2 than today.
Anything can be poisonous in large quantities. You deliberately removed context. It would take 2500 years to reach levels OSHA considers hazardous according to that uigi site.
The point is increased CO2 may not be the cause of the recent decreased pH (in enough amount) and a major coming disaster like the video infers.
Not necessarily:
uigi. com/MSDS_gaseous_CO2.html
Furthermore, doubling the amount in the atmosphere would trigger catastrophic climate changes.
How can you have a debate about the environment without population being addressed?
(a-b-c) = P
P = Z
This is the problem, no one has built a complete model of the existing, everyone is working in their own little project. Time to call a ceasefire and collate ALL the data. The UN is trying, and as much as you do not like that, somebody has to.
cont...
I do not have a problem with the UN compiling data? The summary and inference that all 2500 contributors endorse the summary is what I have problems with, 'cause they dont. Many of the contributors are political figures.