october 27 peace rally -- chicago edition!

30 thousand people marched, danced,
sang, prayed and spoke for peace, in
chicago on october 27, 2007 -- nationwide, over 120,000 people did so.

new york: 45, 000

san fran: 15,000

chicago: 30,000

and so it goes. . .

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• iraq
• peace
• now
• no
• war
• rally
• 30000
• october
• 27
• 2007

[ccgraphics20]

Saddam Hussein was the Conrad Hilton of the terrorist world. He provided a place for terrorists to kick back, relax, and reflect after killing people for a living. After escaping Italian police in October 1985 following the Achille Lauro hijacking (thanks to his Iraqi diplomatic passport), Abu Abbas finally ended up in Baghdad in 1994, where he lived comfortably as one of Saddam Hussein's guests. U.S. soldiers caught Abbas in Iraq in April 2003.

[nolocontendre2007]

and saddam's SUPPLIERS?

his warehouses were stocked

by US, and US-backed, arms-dealers.

t r u e.

[ccgraphics20]

nolocontendre2007 The truth is, we haven't been attacked since 2001... and it's not because they haven't tried. Bush HAS made America safer. He hasn't finished the job. He hasn't even come close. But he has made us safer. Bringing our troops home is letting the terrorists win in Iraq, which will embolden them.

[nolocontendre2007]

i was in london, in the tubes

on the day this statement was

rendered false. either the UK

is part of "we" in your mind,

or not. decide. and declare.

[ccgraphics20]

nolocontendre2007 Not only will pulling our troops out of Iraq embolden the enemy, let them win the war, it will make Iraq a safe haven for terrorists and give them a place to plan their next attacks on other muslim countries (Al Qaeda has attacked several muslim countries), Europe, Spain or America.

[nolocontendre2007]

you never did explain why london

was attacked twice during 2005,

and madrid -- how is your theory

consistent with those facts?

[nolocontendre2007]

this, too, is false. the first

WTC bomber was caught, tried, and

scheduled to go to jail on the

morning of 9.11.01. some say

it was his case that led to 9/11.

so how does THAT, perhaps open

to debate, scenario fit within

your rhetoric?

[nolocontendre2007]

forgive me, but chamberlain was

not at war -- we are. we've done

our part for god and country. time

to come home. saddam is dead.

[nolocontendre2007]

your analogy to chamerlain

isn't even close -- we ARE

at war -- the question is

whether it is time for peace.

chamberlain was as blind as you.

[nolocontendre2007]

now THIS is silly. we should

go find him, if we can. if we

CAN'T, he is no more "correct"

than he was in 1998 or 2001 or

2003. if you are willing to spend

half-a-trillion dollars, and sacri-

fice 4,500 soldiers for one guy,

then we have very little left to

talk about. even if we get him, as

your rant proves -- another will rise.

[nolocontendre2007]

and his SUPPLIERS?

his warehouses were stocked

by US, and US-backed, arms-dealers.

word.

[nolocontendre2007]

by my count you have about 25 posts

here, overnight. good work. none

of that justifies STAYING in iraq.

and saddam is now dead.

so -- can we go home?

i think so.

p e a c e

[ccgraphics20]

There are so many people like you, who feel this is an unnecessary war, a war built on lies, for oil, or a number of other off the wall accusations. Have you done any research on Hussein, his ties to terror and with terrorist?