Iraq Troop Surge Debate : Cathy McMorris Rodgers - Pro Surge

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
315 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 7, 2007

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers ( Republican ) - Washington, 5th District, Spokane, Colville, Walla Walla

View All the Videos in one spot here!
http://iraq.armyofone.org

The House of Representatives debated a non-binding resolution expressing disapproval of President Bush's buildup of U.S. forces in Iraq - February 2007.

[ Footage attributed to C-SPAN, encoded and posted by ArmyOfOne.org ]

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • screw the war I dont aupport the war nor DO I support the war nor do I support the troops who acted on unlawful orders and have allowed for the destruction of the US constitution... Burn in hell you pro war asswipes

  • There is no commitment on the part of most Americans to the Iraq War. No commitment and no sacrifice. If we were not able to borrow the money for the war, it would be over tomorrow.

  • North Korea only pursued its nuclear weapons after the U.S. slightly lessened its sanctions and wouldn't deliver the materials required for it's new energy plants. They waited for three years for U.S. cooperation before saying that they'll continue re-building weapons. The Bushies cut off communication with them, and they went on to build nukes.

  • You think if we leave the terrorists will go, " they left, I guess they're nice people." No, they'll be emboldened by the weakness of the United States; more extremists will start attacks seeing the U.S. as weaklings. While we shouldn't have invaded, leaving will be disastrous. We must let the army figure out the way to streamline the war for maximum efficiency, so we can leave soon; they should do this outside politics.

  • So, we can reduce troops and get the UN involved; I disagree about insurgency: that's why amries have information warfare. We have to start providing the services required, start stepping up security and discipline. We leave and it'll be another Afghanistan. Things are definitely getting better; we should start pull-out not before another year maximum.

  • (continued from previous comment)

    lastly no well established insurgency has ever lost a war in the history of mankind, because an Insurgency lasts forever due to the fact that it's ability to recruit citizens is perpetuated by the presence of the occupying force, the option is we can pull out now or stay for another 10 years and be faced with a messier, more catastrophic pullout then

  • (continued from previous comment)

    another cost of going into Iraq is what I like to call opportunity cost, because we are in Iraq we now have less available troops to manage Afghanistan (which makes fighting the Taliban and Al Qaeda a lot harder, and it also makes it harder to put pressure on North Korea to disarm and to put pressure on Iran to discontinue their nuclear programs

    (comment continues)

  • our presence in Iraq is what is emboldening our enemies

    the strengthening of anti American sentiment is making the job for terrorist recruiters easier

    one example of this is the fact that before we went into Iraq Al Qaeda's presence in Iraq was next to non-Existent, now it is stronger than ever

    (comment continues)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more