Failed Sunspot 1028 on 10-20-2009

They have become desperate as we approach all time sunspot records. If an audit was carried out today many of the sunspots that have been counted over the last 2 years could be striked from record potentially making this minimum much deeper than they are leading people to believe . There are standards and the record holders refuse to conduct themselves accordingly . Instead they have counted everything from a aggravated pore to perhaps dirt on the lens of thier telescopes. What a joke modern science has become . Instead of acknowledging the problems they are adding to it . Science has become nothing more than a perverted politically driven ploy to push agendas forward instead of focusing on the reasons why . No science is setteled and there should always be room for debate , discussion and revisions . Be suspect of anyone or any orginization that claims that science is settled as it is an always changing field . They seem to adjust their numbers to match thier failed predictions . If you will recall they had predicted the maximum originally to be well underway in 2009 with the peak reaching 2010 or 2011 . Want to see proof of this just look up the article "Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle " I'm very sick and I'm dying but you people whom are keeping these official counts are on purpose trying to deceive the masses and I will spend what little time I have left in fighting you to right your wrongs until I have taken my last breath .This failed sunspot takes the cake and they sure could not wait to add it to their bogus counts . Do you people whom keep these records really think that we do not keep track of Solar Activity . Do you think we are ignorant enough to fall for your deception in trying to minamize the greatest minimum since the 1700's . I have devoted the last part of my life in getting the truth out there in a format the general public will understand

I start this short clip with an image zoomed in to see this so called spot at its maximum . Second image of the video is the observation of the So-Called Sunspot by Catania .

Here is another great example of this an aggravated pore that emerged on October 20th 2009 , it was very tiny @ 000.50 and vanished within a few hours

Catania reported an area on 10-20-2009 @ 07:50 @ 27 North & 58 East
SOHO MDI Magnetogram detected the intial eruption @ 08:05
SOHO MDI Continuum ~ suspected area shows up in one single image @ 09:36
Mt. Wilson @ 16:30 did not report any sunspot activity

The planetary A index was 1 on 10-19-2009 and just to low and a hostile for any sunspot development. I think an audit needs to be specifically conducted on counts taken by the Catania Observatory and the SWPC .

In this case do not really bother trying to find the spot because it was simply not there it was just an aggravated pore or a proto-spot on October 20th .I'm not saying there is no chance for development , I'm saying this was in fact not a true sunspot on October 20th 2009 and should not have been counted . You people should be ashamed and in the future mark my words you people will loose your credibility , Sunspot count 11 on 10-20-2009 is nothing more than BS
Nothing gets me up and out of my death bed than this type of deception. You people are playing with fire as long as I'm around

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• SWPC Lies
• deception
• solar minimum
• Global Cooling
• ice age

[Chris2191970]

Just as I figured rapid dissipation the curse of the anomaly . This area should have never been counted to begin with and I have the entire set of images and I will be reviewing them and it is my recommendation that this sunspot be removed from the counts. Soon enough an audit will come and you record keepers will have to answer questions about your observations . A movement is coming and we are going to right your wrongs. It is the only way we will know how deep this minimum really is

[sfstew]

Hey, glad to see you're back on your feet a little. Thanks for the post - I don't always understand exactly but I always read your comments. You're doing an amazing job. I think I get 'enough' - you confirm what I already thought..

[Chris2191970]

oops sorry about that by accident I pushed thumbs down . I meant to push thumbs up . Good comment

[ssnatcherss]

A couple "stupid" questions:

Is there a quantitative definition for what's a sunspot and what isn't? And what's the political significance of inaccurate counts, besides being poor science?

[dragSD]

well done Chris . but are you really diying? . hope not :) for our sake . have a nice day and keep the fighting

[sfstew]

I have nothing but respect for what you're doing.

Thanks again for your diligence.