Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: Dawkins Rap and Idiot Atheists

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,258
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 3, 2008

Video reply to Idiot Atheist Video

Transcript:

Greetings my fair and ignorant friend. I am speaking in response to your so wonderfully well thought out video on the Dawkins rap.

To begin with, no, you don't act like a Christian. You act like a dumb-shit stoner who has read a few philosophy for dummies books and now thinks that you are the Authority on logic. But this is really beside the point.

To begin with I am an Atheist. I question the label idiot since I am not sure what it is your accusing me of being ignorant of. I also didn't favorite the video, but I did enjoy it. It grows on you. Like cancer.

You seem very fond of your pseudo-philosophical rantings. To begin with the phrase "The CULT of Richard Dawkins" is a straw man fallacy. Oops. The whole bit about the people who enjoyed the God Delusion believing or shit does not stink is a blatant Ad Hominem attack. Calling Dawkins an "autistic and socially inept shepherd" is just plain libel and slander. Not to mention that it deeply offends me that you use autism as an insult- considering that several friends and probably my elder brother have some form of autism.

Also, its a second straw man to shout that citing Dawkins as an authority figure is an appeal to authority. Its only fallacious if the figure has no real authority. Dawkins has authority on evolutionary biology, which in turn he uses to support his atheistic beliefs. He has authority. You sir, don't, hence why citing you would be a fallacy.

Also, ten blatant errors? Can you list them? Are they in a previous edition. Do you know if Dawkins corrected them? Are the errors even important to his thesis? What does this even have to do with the rap video?

I don't see why you think that the video wouldn't be taken as a piece of -satire- (proper word). Unless you believe that Mr. Dawkins normally dances in front of a massive censorship machine on his off days.

I agree that the lyrics were genius. Why do you think it must have a catholic origin though? I'd think the line "stooges of popes" would have come from a protestant or any non Catholic. The fact of the matter is though that a chimp could have written -- it doesn't change the fact of its content or existence.

I also am probably going to hit you for the phrase "To intelligent to have an atheistic origin."

Also, by the way, they might be MOCKING the view of science as dogma. Also, you erroneously cite the phrase "Ghost in the Machine" which was originally an attack against the idea of the mind/body dichotomy. Which is christian concept, I might add. Someone hasn't read their Philosophy for Dummies books very well.

I am also absolutely loving the drug abuse red herrings you toss around like German potato mashers. Right next to more accusations of how intellectually inferior all atheists are to you.

I'd say after two minutes I've also gone and made you look like an idiot -- but you do that well enough on your own without my help.

No. It is not a Doomsday clock.

I'm glad Richard Dawkins didn't like it -- he has his own personal tastes. Though I am sure alexander pope probably just rolled over in his grave when you compared a witty post modern song to one of his greatest works of satire. You sir, have no taste, and are completely stupid.

At this point I see no no bearing the that "You Tube Philosophers" (Which, if your irony meter has gone and broke, you are one of) has on your rant. I'm glad you don't like post modernism. Problem is, what your citing is called "nihilism." I am glad to know that you think that, as you so eloquently put it, "That your shit doesn't stink." I love the maturity you display in flipping the camera off, and by comparing rival philosophical ideas fecal matter. I am appreciative of your acknowledgment of the fundamentals of mathematics, and I am glad you've at least read the Wikipedia article on Descartes. What the soliphilistic argument has to do with the Dawkins video, I fail to see.

I'm glad your spent. Hopefully your so spent you won't even post another video. Really -- I'm going to rate your video a one star, not because of your so witty and mature dare to do so, but because it is garbage. If I could vote it less, I would. I do love your visual comparison in the end between Vader and atheists. Real charming.

After all of that, you only have logically proven that your a fool and don't know what you vomit from your mouth. I don't know why I wasted my time doing this. Considering the sixteen second video in reply to you sums it up. You sir, are an idiot.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 78 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Nyronus)

  • Yes. Most Defiantly.

Top Comments

  • Oh my, I just can't stand this pseudo intellectual bullshit anymore. You are exactly what you accuse Mike of being.

  • too much smug... do not want. (I'm an atheist)

see all

All Comments (192)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You use an ad-hominem within 17 seconds and then call him out on using ad-hominems. Well done.

  • You're a disgrace to us atheists

  • @Iddymahn OMG i will enjoy hell, for:

    1: I hear it is nice and warm.

    2 : Only my 'spirit/soul' goes to hell anyway so I won't have any nerve endings or a central nervous system so i won't feel any pain anyway LOL

    (jk there is no god or a hell)

    PEACE

  • religious people, LOL

  • You are a pathetic, pseudointellectual, Dawkins-worshipping troll. You can call that an ad-hominem, and because you are so far up yourself I know you will, but you have proven it in this very video.

    Ditchcotomy? Before you work in 4-syllable words that you just looked up in a dictionary two seconds ago into your sentences you might want to try getting the pronunciation down; it's dichotomy, not ditchchotomy.

  • 1 star because talking down to people and being wrong both in form and delivery doesn't qualify as an argument.

  • Look, I like the video and all, but it's like nails on chalkboard for me to hear you mispronounce 'dichotomy' and 'nihilism".

    They are pronounced as 'die-CAHT-uh-mee' and 'NIE-uhl-iz-um'.

  • if you cant disagree with someone without denigrating their character you and calling them chimps then i think you need to go back to the drawing board. That goes for both of you.

  • uh, i saw the dawkins rap, and i liked it. really nice beat.

    however i fail to see how the video takes a side. to me, it seems like an impartial video made by a spectator of the creationism vs evolution debate. its merely stating the facts in an exaggerated manner.

    most creationists are stupid, so they get kicked out; richard dawkins IS (most likely) smarter than you (not pointing to anyone specifically).

    any similar thoughts, anyone?

  • so true.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more