Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

1995 Japanese Grand Prix Part 10

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,439
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 16, 2008

Part 10 of the 1995 Japanese GP.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I really love this part of the race. "He has done it again, this is unbelievable, he has done it again."

    And after that it is just funny to listen to the English commentators how harsh they are with their own drivers.

  • Respect to the commentators here though,

    theyve avoided biased commentary, and

    admitted, Damon Hill / DC is driving crap.

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Interesting how schumi and hakkinen are the ones that stay on the road and hill and dc are the ones who cant.

  • @Anime998877 agree with 100% the FW17 was the best car of 95 but the Schumi-Brawn combo was just awesome and Williams didn't have the tactical know how to combat it

  • I fully agree with the commentators. The Williams WAS the best car of 95 - Schumi just destroyed them.

  • @arsenium666

    Also here are some other reason DC lost points and the 95 title.

    Aregentina- electronic failure when leading. Points lost 10.

    Spain- gearbox failure when 3rd. 4 points lost.

    Monaco-gearbox failure when 3rd. 4 points lost.

    Belgium-gearbox failure when leading. 10 points lost.

    Italy-wheel bearing failure when leading. 10 points lost.

    Australia-oil leak and engine rev sensor problem causes pitlane crash when leading. 10 points lost.

    So thats 48 points lost by the team not the DRIVER.

  • @arsenium666

    So David Coulthard who scored over 60 podiums and 13 races wins was mediocre? Ha you obviously dont know as much as you like to think you do. He may not have been as good as Schumacher, but NOBODY was. To suggest he is mediocre is to suggest every other driver Schumacher raced agaisnt is mediocre too. Thats retarded. Yes DC made some mistakes in his first full F1 season, but so has every other driver in their first season.

  • @dazcouz

    Wrong...I´m just refering to this TWO Brits as mediocres, not the whole Britain lol...

    If only Senna (trashed Hill) was Brit...or Hakkinen (prior to 95-crash/ trashed Brundle & Blundell) or MS (trashed Irvine)...the three best of the 90´s in that order from my point of view.

    British drivers hadn´t xcelled in the last 20 years, appart from Lewis. Maybe because British Motorsport stablisment has promoted wrong drivers...Hamilton being the exception that proves the rule

  • @arsenium666

    I do agree the Williams was the better car in 1995 and Hill and DC made some silly mistakes in the year, but why do you hate us Brits so much :-/

  • @teamofrivals1

    Wrong...if MS was driving for Williams in 1995 he would had won the title half season

    Mark my words: Williams was a far superior car in 1994, 1995, 1996...Senna lapped 1 second per lap faster than Hill when teammates...remember that for the rest of your LIFES.

  • arsenium666:

    I don't think Williams were the faster car in 1995. Benetton was, even more so with new Renault engines.

  • Hill like Coulthard LOST both 1995 tittles due to their Mediocrecy and Unforced Errors...

    As the comentator backs up, the WIlliams was the FASTER car in 1995...look how both fucktards crashed in the very same corner...Coulthard kept going to crash again in the next corner.

    No other driver spun at Spoon´s like those Britlosers did...natural mediocrecy.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more