1995 Japanese Grand Prix Part 10
Top Comments
All Comments (21)
-
Interesting how schumi and hakkinen are the ones that stay on the road and hill and dc are the ones who cant.
-
@Anime998877 agree with 100% the FW17 was the best car of 95 but the Schumi-Brawn combo was just awesome and Williams didn't have the tactical know how to combat it
-
I fully agree with the commentators. The Williams WAS the best car of 95 - Schumi just destroyed them.
-
Also here are some other reason DC lost points and the 95 title.
Aregentina- electronic failure when leading. Points lost 10.
Spain- gearbox failure when 3rd. 4 points lost.
Monaco-gearbox failure when 3rd. 4 points lost.
Belgium-gearbox failure when leading. 10 points lost.
Italy-wheel bearing failure when leading. 10 points lost.
Australia-oil leak and engine rev sensor problem causes pitlane crash when leading. 10 points lost.
So thats 48 points lost by the team not the DRIVER.
-
So David Coulthard who scored over 60 podiums and 13 races wins was mediocre? Ha you obviously dont know as much as you like to think you do. He may not have been as good as Schumacher, but NOBODY was. To suggest he is mediocre is to suggest every other driver Schumacher raced agaisnt is mediocre too. Thats retarded. Yes DC made some mistakes in his first full F1 season, but so has every other driver in their first season.
-
Wrong...I´m just refering to this TWO Brits as mediocres, not the whole Britain lol...
If only Senna (trashed Hill) was Brit...or Hakkinen (prior to 95-crash/ trashed Brundle & Blundell) or MS (trashed Irvine)...the three best of the 90´s in that order from my point of view.
British drivers hadn´t xcelled in the last 20 years, appart from Lewis. Maybe because British Motorsport stablisment has promoted wrong drivers...Hamilton being the exception that proves the rule
-
I do agree the Williams was the better car in 1995 and Hill and DC made some silly mistakes in the year, but why do you hate us Brits so much :-/
-
Wrong...if MS was driving for Williams in 1995 he would had won the title half season
Mark my words: Williams was a far superior car in 1994, 1995, 1996...Senna lapped 1 second per lap faster than Hill when teammates...remember that for the rest of your LIFES.
-
arsenium666:
I don't think Williams were the faster car in 1995. Benetton was, even more so with new Renault engines.
-
Hill like Coulthard LOST both 1995 tittles due to their Mediocrecy and Unforced Errors...
As the comentator backs up, the WIlliams was the FASTER car in 1995...look how both fucktards crashed in the very same corner...Coulthard kept going to crash again in the next corner.
No other driver spun at Spoon´s like those Britlosers did...natural mediocrecy.
I really love this part of the race. "He has done it again, this is unbelievable, he has done it again."
And after that it is just funny to listen to the English commentators how harsh they are with their own drivers.
schopfheim91 3 years ago 12
Respect to the commentators here though,
theyve avoided biased commentary, and
admitted, Damon Hill / DC is driving crap.
schumifan85 3 years ago 11