opoc engine how it works.mp4

No description available.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 7T8JTH2H4P9GPT2M
• 080701
• 483
• 336
• 384x288

[xeonic2]

I'm looking foward to see this engine running.

[KillaBee23z]

nice, but theory is theory and real working shit is real working shit and I would love to se that. Can you imagine power vs weight ratio on this baby?! just sweet :)

[baldbollocks]

looks like the reporter guy is almost pissing himself laughing..........does he know something that we don't ?

[gottobesaid]

@jackpontiac52 imposable it is the same a two separate cylinders - what your are saying is that your engine as one piston/unit the most efficient in the universe sorry not possible - look up doxford engines as used in ships.

The losses are actually higher due to the difficult path of the gasses in and out of the engine and the additional gearing required to transmit the power from two cranks into one.

[gottobesaid]

@springhill1958 shams or dumb ideas always do

[gottobesaid]

@garyshouse305 far to heavy and to many losses due to the high inertia forces

[gottobesaid]

@ricibiribicci it not advantage and high production cost - pipe dream -

[gottobesaid]

@kspr2635 It will never happen - old idea revamped (Doxford) to may moving parts and no real efficiency advantage. They can be very high torque engines but not fuel efficient

[x0druid0x]

@TheMrshizkabab thumbs up here lol :D !!!!

[kspr2635]

They've got to hurry the fuck up with the development of this engine for commercial applications. I would LOVE to buy one of these in 5 or so years. So just let the army testing work out the kinks. I also bet that it will take a long time before we can buy any of these because all of these "large investors" will fight over the speculated profits before anything is put into production.

[ricibiribicci]

why they don't start to produce it?

[TheMrshizkabab]

Thumbs up if PopSci brought you here!