Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Climate Crock Sacks Hack Attack: The Wrap

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
20,888
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 18, 2010

To help support Climate Denial Crock of the Week
Go to
http://climatecrocks.com/



Morano: Public flogging
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-cyber-bullying
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/index.php/csw/details/denialist-morano-rej...

Politifact
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/dec/11/james-inhofe/i...

Factcheck.org
http://factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/

Cuccinelli
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/06/AR20100506059...
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/virginiapolitics/2010/05/mceachin_proposes_l...
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2010/05/07/washington-post-edi...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/06/AR20100506059...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/01/virginia-seal-breast-picture_n_55967...

Nature: Climatologists under pressure
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/full/462545a.html

AP: Climategate not fraud
http://www.physorg.com/news179857607.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34392959/ns/us_news-environment/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=9319400

House of Commons: Nothing to Climategate
http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/phil%20jones%20hous...
http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/03/02/02climatewire-climategate-scientist-a...

Pakistan heat wave:
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1498

NASA Heat record
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/paper/gistemp2010_draft0601.pdf
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7142976.ece
http://climateprogress.org/2010/06/03/nasa-giss-james-hansen-study-global-war...

Record Low Arctic ice
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2010/06/03/Study-Arctic-ice-at-record-low-poi...
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

  • likes, 36 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (greenman3610)

  • Thank you! Keep up the good work! Your site is a light in the dark ages of global warming denial.

  • @MrZack455

    thanks. plenty more coming. make sure you spread these around! The denier side is relentless, well funded, and, at least at the top, sociopathic.

  • Didn't deal with a single fact agin. You are pathetic! If climategate mails like "Hide the DECLINE" were so insignificant: WHY DID THE IPCC HAVE TO DROP THE HOCKEY STICK GRAPH ON WHICH THEY WERE BASED IN THE NEXT REPORT (AR4)?

    YOU ARE A LYING TOAD greenman!

  • @EvilRoySlad3

    Hide the Decline crock here:

    watch?v=tz8Ve6KE-Us

    "dropped the hockey stick" nonsense - see AR4, Chapter 6, figure 6.10, look at the top legend, see "MBH 1999" (aka "the hockey stick")

    what's changed is there are so many new studies that confirm the basic graph, the older one gets lost. Not that the climate deniers expect their "Fox and Friend" addled audience to actually look.

    But I'm here to help.

  • @greenman3610 The Hockey stick got buried because if was completely contrived. The climategate emails show was a dishonest scam it was to create. Only IPCC lemmings continue to believe.

    Unlike you, I'm not paid by the $tril proAGW lobby to engage in endless responses and the IPCC lies, so I don't care what you write, or how many videos your paid to produce. The truth is coming out and you pricks will all end up in jail.

    People: Google Svensmark, Plimer, Spencer, Ball, Lindzen, Evans and Nova

  • @EvilRoySlad3

    magical thinking is a vital part of denialism. I just showed you your statement is wrong, yet you keep repeating ad nauseum

    repetition doesn't have a chance of working unless you are clicking your ruby slippers together at the same time.

    just here to help

see all

All Comments (1,613)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @david222444 You completely ignored my question, because what you just said doesn't have anything to do with what I was talking about.

    Don't comment to me again you dishonest idiot. You're not serious about a real debate. You are too scared to answer my questions. Good thing others can see this because its funny.

  • @thesparitan A faulty climate model gives faulty evidence. Scientific theory is usually proved by the appropriate scientific experiment.

  • @david222444 Yes I do, but do you? Do you mean mathematical proof? because that is usually how the term is used or a legal one? A proof is derived from the evidence. How could I prove a fact about the without evidence of even its existence. You cannot argue your way to a fact and/or piece of evidence. But lets forget proper usage of terms for the moment and let me rephrase.

    What proof would you need to accept Human caused climate change is extremely likely, and harmful?

  • @thesparitan I do not want evidence, I want proof. Do you understand the difference?

  • @david222444 What evidence would you need to accept AGW?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more