Internet atheist claims victory!!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,083
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2012

CultofDusty using a logical fallacy whilst pretending his view is logical.

Dusty Smith is the esteemed author of the book:
'Adult Autopilot: unlimited porn / take your piece of a four billion per year industry / copy and paste your way to wealth.'

I might have overestimated him when I joked about him being 'working class'!

The funny thing is when you read the free excerpt from Chapter 1 he talks about how you can manipulate hits on internet websites!! Funny chap. I'm sure the book must be just a joke.

Some empirical problems with the Dusty claims though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VU_rTX23V7Q&feature=related

9,853,074 views.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PTvr755V8s&feature=related

7,057,013 views: 15,532 likes with only 236 dislikes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IAhDGYlpqY&list=UUc4yillQaNo6a-iG2PYbbrA&...

6,263,697 views: 137,538 likes and only 16,374 dislikes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIngd6uvstw&feature=related

4,254,318 views: 4,920 likes and only 134 dislikes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CBNE25rtnE

3,668,220 views: 9,302 likes and only 345 dislikes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnztMhtUF6o&feature=channel_video_title

2,352,350 views: 11,716 likes and just 91 dislikes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzqTFNfeDnE&feature=channel_video_title

1,796,249 views: 11,243 likes and only 397 dislikes.

  • likes, 83 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheCartesianTheist)

  • Yesterday I have a little debate with dusty in it's "fuck chuck norris video".

    When I asked him if smart people need to be rash, need to insult, and need to got a very angry attitude to explain it's points he remains on silence and never answered me.

    If this angry ignorant is pretending to debate with CartesianTheist, it wil be a 2 minutes edbate, Dusty it's clearly very incapable of making a proper debate.

  • @ForceOfLight

    Well done. Is he a bit nicer when debating him?

    He was supposed to debate me last weekend but didn't turn up so I'm hoping we can rearrange it soon.

  • @TheCartesianTheist

    He just can't say other word than "fuck" or "motherfucker" and blame everybody because we're not atheist, you know, what common atheist do usually.

    I hope to see that debate soon man =) would be very funny watch Dusty more angry than ever.

  • @ForceOfLight

    Well don't tell him but I've done my homework and caught him saying all kinds of contradictory things. So his version of 'logic' must ignore the law of noncontradiction that's for sure! This is not likely to make him a happy bunny.

    That's a shame. I thought all the swearing would just be bluster for his video ratings. I didn't think he'd keep the persona going in debates. That's only going to make him look even worse. Shame.

  • @TheCartesianTheist

    Absolutely, I was waiting a nice debate since it's first answer, but when he rampages and fill the posts with insults, contradictory arguments about moral and incoherent sentences about the classic "no proof" argument, I was like "wow, and people like this guy?". It's a shame, indeed but someone have to put Dusty on it's place.

  • @ForceOfLight

    At the moment "angry atheism" sells though! I could rationally take him to the cleaners and someone in the comment thread of the debate will write: "I loved it when you shouted at him and called him a f***ing idiot! Ur the best Dusty!!"

Video Responses

This video is a response to Atheists Own The Internet!
see all

All Comments (803)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheCartesianTheist

    I know, when I debated with him people write that, and I laugh a lot, there are loss people that hide into their imaginary world of their supposed "logic", so, it's just... normal.

  • @sybite

    Thank you for the chat. Enjoy the rest of your night. :)

  • @sybite

    Here's an exercise in basic critical reasoning.

    The only substantive objection you've raised to Borde et al.'s conjecture regarding the incompleteness of past space-time is the Hawking-Hartle model. I've raised substantive objections to the no-boundaries proposal in that it is essentially non-realistic. You need to either defend the latter or formulate new arguments against the former.

    "plagiarize"

    Oh have I now? Perhaps you'd like to web search the text and see what you get?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more