@gta4ishardcore Just blah-blah-blah!))) Of course Ch-47 was not copied from Yak-24. He just appeared 10 years later and looks pretty like the Russian helicopter. But it isn't copied! Some one please help me! I'm dying laughing! Now I understand why that transport helicopter has such a pathetic payload capability. It's clear! Cuz it was derived from an ancient Russian helicopter. Also it may be the reason why americans helis can't fly themselves and need the Russian ones to carry them! XD
@BorshCaen long story short, your a russian communist asshole, the CH-47 is an amazing aircraft that both brittish and americans use and was not copied form that piece of shit failure that sounds like someone puking.
@gta4ishardcore Bristol is out of compition. His the first flyght had appeared in 1958. Well, do you mean H-21 the flying didlo??? Yak-24 had began to fly in the same year. And of course they don't look alike. It's Ch-47 noticeably look like the Russian one. So that was USA who made a copy of our helicpter.
@SovietUnity fuck you and your ugly aircraft, this is a copy of the early american twin rotor helicopters like the H-21 and the Bristol Type 192. Fuck Russia you bunch of commie bastards!
Russian engineers of Stalin times had to make tough decisions. They were free to design and think of just about anything (there were designs for 2500t planes,4x An-224 weight, then flying sub or plane that can dive and has torpedoes, then really most inovative planes of 30's like fixed wing or first true fighter plane). The only problem was that if the design failed to furfill expectations, they were punished for treason. There were some conc. camps, but only for a few years of stalins reign...
well, I agreee that many Stalin's engineers were working with fear, but not Yakovlev. He had good relations with Stalin, Stalin made him a minister of aircraft production. Yakovlev had the greater influence than all Soviet aircraft designers.
Classic rare footage. Amazing old machine (legacy of Stalin's 'engineering by fear'), with TWO inboard engines - redundancy useful if one engine where to fail. Check out other old tandems like the Bristol Belvedere
@gta4ishardcore Just blah-blah-blah!))) Of course Ch-47 was not copied from Yak-24. He just appeared 10 years later and looks pretty like the Russian helicopter. But it isn't copied! Some one please help me! I'm dying laughing! Now I understand why that transport helicopter has such a pathetic payload capability. It's clear! Cuz it was derived from an ancient Russian helicopter. Also it may be the reason why americans helis can't fly themselves and need the Russian ones to carry them! XD
BorshCaen 7 months ago
@BorshCaen long story short, your a russian communist asshole, the CH-47 is an amazing aircraft that both brittish and americans use and was not copied form that piece of shit failure that sounds like someone puking.
gta4ishardcore 7 months ago
@gta4ishardcore Bristol is out of compition. His the first flyght had appeared in 1958. Well, do you mean H-21 the flying didlo??? Yak-24 had began to fly in the same year. And of course they don't look alike. It's Ch-47 noticeably look like the Russian one. So that was USA who made a copy of our helicpter.
BorshCaen 7 months ago
@SovietUnity fuck you and your ugly aircraft, this is a copy of the early american twin rotor helicopters like the H-21 and the Bristol Type 192. Fuck Russia you bunch of commie bastards!
gta4ishardcore 8 months ago
Russian engineers of Stalin times had to make tough decisions. They were free to design and think of just about anything (there were designs for 2500t planes,4x An-224 weight, then flying sub or plane that can dive and has torpedoes, then really most inovative planes of 30's like fixed wing or first true fighter plane). The only problem was that if the design failed to furfill expectations, they were punished for treason. There were some conc. camps, but only for a few years of stalins reign...
KriegHeil 1 year ago
Ha! Chinook was copied from this! Americans, where is your creativity?
SovietUnity 1 year ago 2
aaaa
kosiak10851 2 years ago
well, I agreee that many Stalin's engineers were working with fear, but not Yakovlev. He had good relations with Stalin, Stalin made him a minister of aircraft production. Yakovlev had the greater influence than all Soviet aircraft designers.
kosiak10851 2 years ago
Classic rare footage. Amazing old machine (legacy of Stalin's 'engineering by fear'), with TWO inboard engines - redundancy useful if one engine where to fail. Check out other old tandems like the Bristol Belvedere
Deinacrida 2 years ago