PROBLEM - There is no direct proof an increase of 100 ppm in CO2 has any effect on temp. Fact is an increase of 100 ppm CO2 has a no effect on temperature in the lab, none! You need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm to see a 3 degree C change. Global warming nuts then say, well the lab is not fair because CO2 is 50,000 feet of atmosphere. So there are some theories based on an idea of layers in 50,000 feet that tries to prove
a 100ppm increase in CO2 increase temperature a few tenths of one degree F. This is an insignificant increase much less proof of man made global warming so the global warming nuts say well CO2 has an amplifying effect and then they rely on flawed global warming models which are grossly positive lookback biased so of course they are going to show an amplifying effect from a small amount of CO2 as they are built to do this but note flawed models are not proof much less science.
Really I am wondering what part of the science convinces you man made global warming is a fact, because you are just repeating the same old BS? The typical answer 99% of the time is well all scientists say it is true but for one this not true like RM Carter who is one of many that disagrees and has published an excellent paper in an easy to read format going through all the science and issues. Search for R M Carter paper entitled Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate. Note it says..
Lets be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus
This is not climate change facts. Simply a climate change slide show
rdhayes06 2 years ago
PROBLEM - There is no direct proof an increase of 100 ppm in CO2 has any effect on temp. Fact is an increase of 100 ppm CO2 has a no effect on temperature in the lab, none! You need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm to see a 3 degree C change. Global warming nuts then say, well the lab is not fair because CO2 is 50,000 feet of atmosphere. So there are some theories based on an idea of layers in 50,000 feet that tries to prove
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
a 100ppm increase in CO2 increase temperature a few tenths of one degree F. This is an insignificant increase much less proof of man made global warming so the global warming nuts say well CO2 has an amplifying effect and then they rely on flawed global warming models which are grossly positive lookback biased so of course they are going to show an amplifying effect from a small amount of CO2 as they are built to do this but note flawed models are not proof much less science.
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
Really I am wondering what part of the science convinces you man made global warming is a fact, because you are just repeating the same old BS? The typical answer 99% of the time is well all scientists say it is true but for one this not true like RM Carter who is one of many that disagrees and has published an excellent paper in an easy to read format going through all the science and issues. Search for R M Carter paper entitled Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate. Note it says..
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
Lets be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago