zelda timeline what's canon I INVITE AND ENCOURAGE VIDEO RESPONSES!!!

No description available.

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• zelda
• timeline
• what's
• canon

[kidsgotgame3]

i saw that comment on fred, it was really stupid. HAHA

[handheldgamer144]

@kidsgotgame3 which one? The "good ideas" one? I just want Fred's series to end or for Fred's channel to get removed.

[FatPastyWhiteBoy]

handheldgamer144 is such a lancun wannabe

[handheldgamer144]

@FatPastyWhiteBoy have you seen Nintendo UK's unofficial timeline? it is almost exactly Lancun's except with the first three in the child timeline.

I intend to prove you wrong.

I am a lot morel like trueedge2097 than Lancun. I put words on the screen instead of commentary. And I have not showed any metroid videos or lp's yet. I am merely a nerd/geek/programmer who has never played an n64.

Shows how much you know.

[nerfshredder3395]

I DIDN"T MAKE THOSE CANON LEVELS UP!!!!!! The games are Japanese, so the japanese text is canon. I am posting videos with translations of TMC, TP, FSA, and TWW by the end of next week. And I also support that all evidence has to come from the games itself. The Miyamoto timeline was revealed to have been mistrnaslated ages ago, It was confirmed by someone who knows a few people at NOA. And there is a canon involving TMC. It precedes FS and FSA. And movie maker sucks.

[handheldgamer144]

I did not say you made them up. I am just saying that we are arguing about what's canon, when there could be four or more actual timelines that actually make sense, only one of which agrees with the official statements.

"movie maker sucks"

no kidding!

[Nekomimixx]

Teehee! I go for Courage realm the most. ^.^

[Zeldaholictimeliner]

sigh, Nobody from Nintendo of Japan ever claimed A Link to the Past came before the NES games. That was all the work of Nintendo of America who for some reason assumed they did. Miyamoto himself the creator as you pointed out directly stated that it was the other way round. That was the only official statement concerning the first four games made by a Japanese person

[SighOfTheOppressed]

Though it seems clear that the CD-I games such as WoG, FoE and ZA are not canon, some games are still ambiguous. Most people place LoZ, Aol, ALttP, LA, OoT, MM, OoS, OoA, FS, WW, FSA, MC, TP, PH and ST as canon, though the Zelda Game & Watch, not to be confused with the Zelda Game Watch, does fit in the timeline as a sequel to AoL, though its' admission in the canon is debatable. It is a first party nintendo game, but is usually dismissed in most timelines. Any comments on this?

[handheldgamer144]

...

I still say that the handheld gmes are more entertaining. Also, MM can just be ignored. The speculation of Shade having upgrades from MM is false, and you can see proof in almost any cutscene with shade.

Plus, there are going to be a lot more handheld canon games. Isn't the remake of ALttP for GBA considered the "canon" version? And the remakes of the NES classics?