Red Steel 2 Review

This is my review over Red Steel 2. The first Red Steel was a valiant effort for Ubisoft to bring first person swordplay and gun combat to the wii, but does Red Steel 2 make up for Ubisoft's first disappointment?

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• Red
• Steel
• Review
• Nintendo
• Wii

[newbelt]

is there a multiplayer?

[TheKnightOf0]

@newbelt

No

[marioluigiphone]

@TheKnightOf0 which is the best wii fps/3rd person??

[GregnotGreg]

@nakariri no its not

[freddy692000]

i own a wii and its very fun but if it had a very strong graphics system like a 900euro PC it would be the BEST console in the market and it would be for years

[nakariri]

is the game playable without the wiimote motion plus?

[10xSRK]

Great review man. Excellent display of your hands vs. the on-screen action.

[TheKnightOf0]

@TetlowTime101 Most reviewers say that it's an improvement over the first red steel. I never said that, In my review, I simply said that the 1st red steel was a "valiant effort for Ubisoft to bring their vision of first person swordplay..gun combat to the wii." I think it's important to compare this game to the first because a lot of people were concerned that it would end up just as bad as the first.

As for the sword and gun gameplay, that's what the game's main focus so I need to talk about it

[TetlowTime101]

@TheKnightOf0 what about how its an improvment of red steel, the sword and gun gameplay the precision and notably the awkward door openings

[TheKnightOf0]

@TetlowTime101 The only similarities I found between my review and IGN's review is the game's presentation "East meets west... Japanese architect... etc."

I don't like IGN's nintendo team, and I usually don't like there reviews over nintendo games lately because they leave a lot of stuff out that I feel they should talk about in there reviews. So if my review sounds anything like IGN's, it is a coincidence.