2007 mustang v6 0-115
Loading...
Loading...
36,173
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 9:59Me test driving the v6 mustangby mustang200531,573 views
- 0:312012 Mustang GT 0-145mphby NosferatuSRT12,565 views
- 0:242007 Mustang V6 0-60 Bone Stockby GoCubbyz11,445 views
- 0:262011 Ford Mustang 3.7L V6 6AT 0-100by floorit32165,432 views
- 3:262004 V6 Mustang vs 2007 V6 Mustangby zzburn1124,824 views
- 0:17V6 engine animationby TheRenalicious42,798 views
- 1:48Mustang V6 BBK headers, X pipe, and Dynomax exh...by mustang980731,425 views
- 0:352007 Mustang V6 Magnaflow Exhaustby speeddemon071226,873 views
- 3:20Mustang 06 v6 New Mods 0-115 & Accelerationby spader049,754 views
- 0:22Mustang 4.0 V6 going flatoutby Rabbit19868,808 views
- 2:27Ford Mustang (4.0L V6) power and speed testby kastro7938,579 views
- 0:14ford mustang accelerationby dusik8138,448 views
- 0:122005 Mustang V6 0-60by MustangZ0524,153 views
- 1:072007 Mustang V6 Pony Flowmaster AT exhaustby jtbndy52,259 views
- 0:092007 Mustang V6 0-60 mph. 0-100 km/h 5.5 secby icebiggice1,739 views
- 1:17Procharged 2007 Mustang V6by bandit0226,266 views
- 0:1907 jeep compass 0-65by Kameron123119909,074 views
- 3:142007 V6 Mustang- no mufflerby atlanticblue983,578 views
- 5:582007 Mustang V6 Projectby mustang98071,862 views
@wongmylesa yup, a 3L V6 with forged internals, and a turbo pushing 400hp is easssssy. and more fuel efficent.
matched to an 8speed sequential gearbox and were talking serious performance. not exactly the mustang way, but a wiked combo none the less.
CemetaryGatesML 2 months ago
I think the V8 is the future for the fast cars. Not even the rich can afford to drive a big 10 cyl
JManGuitar5150 4 months ago
@ogpauly But trend, has nothing to do with the future. The future is absolutely effecting the power trains in vehicles. Ex. Ford, Mercedes, BMW, Hyundai... Turbo, Direct Injection, Lowering displacement. I dunno dude, whatever. Im just saying, I dont think the V8 will last much longer (Unless its in a GT500)
wongmylesa 5 months ago
@wongmylesa well stangs have always had a moderate displacement v8 offered as the high performance model (even higher performance offered with the 427,8,9 v8's offered around the 70's in the mach 1's and gt500s) with a decent powered lower cylinder count as a lower option (the early stangs had straight 6s, the foxes had the 4 bangers, and now we have the v6s) but the trend shows that v8's are not gunna change any time soon. I'm not saying 100% but most likely
ogpauly 5 months ago
and i disagree... The 3.5 ecoboost has 365 HP, Im sure that a 3.7 could easily make about 400. Plus high MPG? Makes sense. The V8 may last another generation... Who knows?
wongmylesa 5 months ago
@ogpauly Absolutely not, they also had a V6 and an I6. The 2.3 was the GT until the 5.0 came out.
wongmylesa 5 months ago
@wongmylesa i'm pretty sure that the whole fox lineup was either the 5.0 or the 2.3 turbo. The 2.3 was shitty, but the 5.0 is still awesome. You can push gobs of power out of it. I don't think that ford will ever make their gt a v6, but the v6 will definately be an option.
ogpauly 5 months ago
@Storm7289 Uh? Point being, the mustang GT was once a 4 cylinder. I could definitely be a V6 if ford wanted it to be, Hence the fact there is no ecoboost avail for the mustang yet. Hence the fact that ford wants to ecoboost every car in its line up. hence the fact there is no 3.7 EcoBoost yet? The next GT, or equivalent. Will more then likely be a twin turbo DI V6...
wongmylesa 5 months ago
@ogpauly Not in 83-88. In 88 it got the 5.0 before it was a 4.2, I believe? :O The turbo was sold as the performance model. Keep in mind, That was the worse mustang. Anyways, the mustang had a 4 cylinder with no turbo, and one with turbo.
wongmylesa 5 months ago
@wongmylesa ok?
Storm7289 5 months ago