The Good Earth - A Critique and Parody

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
306 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 27, 2009

...seriously. HOW did this win the Nobel Prize AND the Pulitzer Prize? I mean, GAWD. But I confess, I am doing this more for fun than any real!activist! reason. Meheh. Someone has to criticize it though. Ah, and there's a lot of irony/contradictions, but I -might- just be covering up my failure. Who cares?

ENJOY! (TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, PLEASE :P)
This is a pretty random (and quickly-paced) film--keep your eyes open for the geometric/fibonacci/artihmetic sequences.

music: MIDI made by a friend of SSBM music (Mushroom Kingdom, xDDD)
pictures: drawn by Artemis (wow, yes, I know...)
ideas/etc: friends/classmates, given nicknames not-by-choice
book: The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (xotsukiyume)

  • Oh good; someone else agrees with me that the whole of the book was actually bad~ And for more legitimate reasons than "omg; it was, like, 300 pages of required reading!!". This was a hilarious video, and I'm glad that you parodied it--the diction examples were exactly what I had in mind!

  • @tYcoriania

    Thank you so much~! ^^

  • You are reading it as though she wrote it sitting next to you. She wrote it in 1930. She wrote it trying to emphasize the obedience of women and their mistreatment. O-lan is a heroine, in what epic or novel do you think that all the actions of a hero are believable?

  • @jc5five

    *shrugs* ...I thought that the unbelievability of her actions were just issue #2. Besides the convolutedness of the plot, the crappy diction and tone, and the creepy aspects of Chinese culture which she chose to emphasize, sure, it's a couple leaflets of decent pages.

  • @jc5five

    But the real problem I have with O-lan's (surreal) capabilities is that Pearl S. Buck has stated in interview after interview that the purpose of this novel wasn't just to write some epic!adventure story about "teh aweshume OLAN and her equally aweshume marriage" but to "demystify" (what that means is anyone's guess here) the mysteries surrounding the orient. The whole of this video was on how she failed to do that.

Top Comments

  • LOLLL.

    (I agree, tho!)

see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Funny, intelligent video. In general I like Pearl Buck - the writing can seem simpleminded but the action carries me along. She writes from deep knowledge of Imperial China. Girls were sold, men took concubines and women had low official status. The characterizations now seem condescending but in the 1920s she was countering negative stereotypes. Try "The Hidden Flower" for a trite beginning that turns into something more interesting. Thanks for the laugh. I can tell you like to think.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more